• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从理论到实践:运用规范化过程理论和理论领域框架理解基层医疗中脱碳的实施情况。

From theory to practice: using the Normalization Process Theory and Theoretical Domains Framework to understand implementation of decarbonization in general practice.

作者信息

Nunes Ana Raquel, Atherton Helen, Dahlmann Frederik, Eccles Abi, Geddes Olivia, Gregg Michael, Karaba Florence, Spencer Rachel, Twohig Helen, Dale Jeremy

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, Medical School Building, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.

School of Primary Care, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO16 5ST, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2025 Jun 4;42(4). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf050.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmaf050
PMID:40600301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12214461/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decarbonization in general practice is a critical step toward achieving a net zero healthcare system. Understanding the factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation of environmentally sustainable practices is essential for effective and equitable action. Hence, the overarching aim of this study is to advance understanding of the factors influencing decarbonization in general practice. This study's objective is to map and compare the application of the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) in understanding the key factors and sub-factors related to decarbonization in general practice.

METHODS

Factors derived from a systematic review and narrative synthesis were mapped to NPT constructs and TDF domains by a multidisciplinary team of 10 coders, including academic general practitioners (GPs), researchers, and patient representatives. The mapping was conducted independently, and coder agreement was evaluated for consistency and reliability in categorization.

RESULTS

The study identifies key NPT ('Coherence', 'Collective Action', and 'Cognitive Participation') and TDF domains ('Environmental Context and Resources', 'Knowledge', and 'Social/professional role and identity') associated with factors identified in previous research as being associated with achieving decarbonization in general practice. A high intercoder reliability rate (73% for NPT, 84% for TDF) supports the consistency of the analysis, particularly for structured drivers such as financial incentives and policy support.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that the NPT and TDF frameworks provide useful, though incomplete, insights into factors influencing decarbonization in general practice. Such factors require more attention when developing evidence-based strategies for promoting decarbonization, something that future research could evaluate.

摘要

背景

全科医疗中的脱碳是实现医疗系统净零排放的关键一步。了解促进或阻碍环境可持续实践实施的因素对于有效且公平地采取行动至关重要。因此,本研究的总体目标是增进对影响全科医疗脱碳因素的理解。本研究的目的是绘制并比较规范化过程理论(NPT)和理论领域框架(TDF)在理解与全科医疗脱碳相关的关键因素和子因素方面的应用。

方法

由10名编码员组成的多学科团队,包括学术全科医生(GPs)、研究人员和患者代表,将系统评价和叙述性综合得出的因素映射到NPT结构和TDF领域。映射工作独立进行,并评估编码员在分类方面的一致性和可靠性。

结果

该研究确定了与先前研究中确定的与全科医疗实现脱碳相关的因素相关的关键NPT(“连贯性”、“集体行动”和“认知参与”)和TDF领域(“环境背景与资源”、“知识”以及“社会/专业角色与身份”)。较高的编码员间信度率(NPT为73%,TDF为84%)支持了分析的一致性,特别是对于财务激励和政策支持等结构化驱动因素。

结论

研究结果表明,NPT和TDF框架为影响全科医疗脱碳的因素提供了有用但不完整的见解。在制定促进脱碳的循证策略时,这些因素需要更多关注,未来的研究可以对此进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f26/12214461/4fffd356cbe3/cmaf050_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f26/12214461/4fffd356cbe3/cmaf050_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f26/12214461/4fffd356cbe3/cmaf050_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
From theory to practice: using the Normalization Process Theory and Theoretical Domains Framework to understand implementation of decarbonization in general practice.从理论到实践:运用规范化过程理论和理论领域框架理解基层医疗中脱碳的实施情况。
Fam Pract. 2025 Jun 4;42(4). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf050.
2
Understanding factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.理解影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施医学风险沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Supporting translation of research evidence into practice-the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.支持研究证据转化为实践——使用规范进程理论评估和为随机对照试验中的实施提供信息:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 27;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01311-1.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
6
Effectiveness of using implementation frameworks to facilitate the implementation of a stroke management guideline in the traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in China: protocol for a factorial randomised controlled trial.在中国中医医院使用实施框架促进卒中管理指南实施的有效性:析因随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e078103. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078103.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework.影响初级保健实践中酒精使用筛查和简短干预措施实施的因素:使用 COM-B 系统和理论领域框架的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01073-0.
9
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
10
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.木材废料的增值与分类方法:一项系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.全科医疗中脱碳行动的实施:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 19;15(2):e091404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091404.
2
Implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol.一般实践中脱碳行动的实施:一项系统评价与叙述性综合方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 16;14(9):e087795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087795.
3
Primary care's preparedness for extreme weather events.基层医疗对极端天气事件的应对准备。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 May 30;74(743):248-249. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X738249. Print 2024 Jun.
4
Patients' perceptions of climate-sensitive health counselling in primary care: Qualitative results from Germany.患者对初级保健中与气候相关的健康咨询的看法:来自德国的定性研究结果。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2284261. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2284261. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
5
The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms.柳叶刀倒计时 2023 年健康与气候变化报告:在世界面临不可逆转损害的情况下,以健康为中心应对的紧迫性。
Lancet. 2023 Dec 16;402(10419):2346-2394. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
Climate change mitigation: Qualitative analysis of environmental impact-reducing strategies in German primary care.气候变化缓解:德国初级保健中减少环境影响策略的定性分析。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2232946. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2232946.
7
Primary Care Clinicians' Attitude, Knowledge, and Willingness to Address Climate Change in Shared Decision-Making.初级保健临床医生在共同决策中应对气候变化的态度、知识和意愿。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar 11;37(1):25-34. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230027R1.
8
Fair pathways to net-zero healthcare.实现医疗保健净零排放的公平途径。
Nat Med. 2023 May;29(5):1078-1084. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02351-2. Epub 2023 May 18.
9
Behavioural change interventions encouraging clinicians to reduce carbon emissions in clinical activity: a systematic review.行为改变干预措施鼓励临床医生减少临床活动中的碳排放:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09370-2.
10
What can we learn from Australian general practices taking steps to be more environmentally sustainable? A qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医学采取措施提高环境可持续性,我们能从中得到什么启示?一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2023 May 31;40(3):465-472. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad027.