He Wenjun, Cai Yiyuan, Hao Chun, Chen Zhuo, Shi Yuning, Guo Pengfei, Lv Sensen, Zhang Lanping, Zhao Qing, Liu Lingrui, Cai Yefeng, Xu Dong Roman
Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e078103. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078103.
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is commonly used alongside Western medicine for stroke management in China. However, there is significant variation in TCM practice, and the utilisation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines is inadequate. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of three popular frameworks-Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Normalization Process Theory (NPT)-in improving implementation outcomes for the integrated TCM and Western medicine clinical practice guideline for stroke management.
This study employs a hybrid type III design with a factorial randomised controlled trial, where 45 TCM hospitals will be randomly assigned to one of eight experimental conditions based on the use or non-use of each framework (CFIR, TDF, NPT). The factorial design allows for the evaluation of the main effects of each framework and their two-way and three-way interactions, offering insights into which combination of frameworks is most effective in enhancing implementation outcomes. The factorial design provides greater efficiency compared with traditional designs by enabling the simultaneous testing of multiple interventions and their combinations with the same sample size, which increases statistical power. Implementation facilitators will be trained to support the guideline adoption process, with interventions aligned to specific framework components (eg, CFIR for identifying barriers and facilitators, TDF for understanding behavioural influences and NPT for normalising practices within organisational routines). Outcomes will be evaluated using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance). Hierarchical logistic regression models will test the study hypotheses, and qualitative methods, such as interviews and focus groups, will provide contextual understanding. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted to assess the economic feasibility of the implementation strategies.
This trial has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Southern Medical University (approval number: #202261) and follows all relevant ethical guidelines for research involving human participants. On completion, the findings will be shared with patients, healthcare providers and stakeholders through various dissemination activities, including workshops and presentations within relevant TCM and stroke management networks. The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and presented at national and international conferences to inform future practice and policy on the integration of TCM and Western medicine for stroke management.
This study has been registered on the Open Science Framework with the DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NJEVB.
在中国,中医通常与西医一起用于中风管理。然而,中医实践存在显著差异,基于证据的临床实践指南的利用率不足。本研究旨在评估三种流行框架——实施研究综合框架(CFIR)、理论领域框架(TDF)和规范化过程理论(NPT)——对改善中西医结合中风管理临床实践指南实施效果的有效性。
本研究采用混合III型设计及析因随机对照试验,45家中医院将根据是否使用每个框架(CFIR、TDF、NPT)被随机分配到八个实验条件之一。析因设计允许评估每个框架的主要效应及其双向和三向交互作用,从而深入了解哪种框架组合在提高实施效果方面最有效。与传统设计相比,析因设计通过在相同样本量下同时测试多种干预措施及其组合,提高了效率,增强了统计效力。将对实施促进者进行培训,以支持指南采用过程,干预措施与特定框架组件保持一致(例如,CFIR用于识别障碍和促进因素,TDF用于理解行为影响,NPT用于在组织常规中规范实践)。将使用RE-AIM框架(覆盖范围、有效性、采用率、实施和维持)评估结果。分层逻辑回归模型将检验研究假设,定性方法,如访谈和焦点小组,将提供背景理解。此外,将进行成本效益分析,以评估实施策略的经济可行性。
本试验已获得南方医科大学机构审查委员会的批准(批准号:#202261),并遵循涉及人类受试者研究的所有相关伦理准则。研究完成后,研究结果将通过各种传播活动与患者、医疗服务提供者和利益相关者分享,包括在相关中医和中风管理网络内举办的研讨会和讲座。研究结果将发表在同行评审的学术期刊上,并在国内和国际会议上展示,为中西医结合中风管理的未来实践和政策提供参考。
本研究已在开放科学框架上注册,DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/NJEVB。