Halvorson Max A, Pedersen Sarah L, Feil Madison C, Lengua Liliana J, Molina Brooke S G, King Kevin M
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):796-812. doi: 10.1177/1073191120939161. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
Emerging evidence suggests impulsive states may be reliably measured in the moment using ecological momentary assessment (EMA); however, research has not investigated whether the multi-factor structure of impulsive traits also characterizes impulsive states. In two independent samples spanning adolescence through young adulthood ( = 211, = 222), we adapted global self-report measures of impulsive traits to EMA and conducted multilevel confirmatory factor analyses to characterize the within- and between-person factor structure of five impulsive traits (negative urgency, planning, persistence, sensation seeking, and positive urgency). Across both studies, factor models with one factor for each UPPS-P facet fit the data well at both levels, though some latent factors were highly correlated. Aggregated impulsive states, especially negative urgency, predicted oppositional defiant disorder symptoms, emotional problems, alcohol problems, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Our results suggest that EMA measures can capture a range of impulsive states that mirrors the heterogeneity seen in the trait literature.
新出现的证据表明,冲动状态可能可以通过生态瞬时评估(EMA)在当下可靠地测量;然而,研究尚未调查冲动特质的多因素结构是否也表征冲动状态。在两个独立样本中,样本涵盖了从青少年到青年期(N1 = 211,N2 = 222),我们将冲动特质的整体自我报告测量方法改编为EMA,并进行了多水平验证性因素分析,以刻画五个冲动特质(消极紧迫性、计划性、坚持性、寻求刺激和积极紧迫性)在个体内和个体间的因素结构。在两项研究中,针对UPPS-P各维度设置一个因素的因素模型在两个水平上都能很好地拟合数据,尽管一些潜在因素高度相关。聚合的冲动状态,尤其是消极紧迫性,预测了对立违抗障碍症状、情绪问题、酒精问题和注意缺陷多动障碍症状。我们的结果表明,EMA测量方法能够捕捉一系列冲动状态,这些状态反映了特质文献中所呈现的异质性。