• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19大流行期间土耳其公民和移民剖宫产麻醉技术选择的变化:中断时间序列分析

Changes in the choice of anaesthetic techniques for caesarean sections among Turkish citizens and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis.

作者信息

Baltali Sevim, Baltali Mehmet, Ercan Ayşegül, Akdağ Umut Deniz, Toptaş Mehmet

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Kasap İlyas Mah. Org. Abdurrahman Nafiz Gürman Cd. 34098 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Uskudar University, Saray Mah. Ahmet Tevfik İleri Cad. No:18 - 34768, Ümraniye, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07805-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07805-8
PMID:40604557
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on changes in the choice of anaesthetic techniques for singleton caesarean sections among Turkish citizens and migrants before, during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and after vaccination.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. It included data from 9,744 consecutive women-7,083 (72.7%) Turkish citizens and 2,661 (27.3%) migrants-who underwent singleton caesarean sections between March 2018 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the change in monthly utilization rates of neuraxial anaesthesia (NA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary objectives included caesarean section urgency and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, there was an increasing trend in the number of caesarean sections performed using NA among Turkish citizens and migrants (relative ratio [RR] 1.003, P < 0.001 and RR 1.005, P < 0.01, respectively). Both groups showed a significant immediate increase in the usage rate of NA at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (RR 1.095, P < 0.001 and 1.134, P < 0.001, respectively). The introduction of vaccination had no effect on the use of NA (RR 0.970, P = 1.004, and RR 1.000, P = 0.99, respectively). The significant between-group difference in the pre-pandemic usage rate of NA diminished following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no significant between-group difference observed after vaccination (93.3% vs. 90.9%., P = 0.006, 98.4% vs. 97.1%, P = 0.0; 95.4% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.801, respectively). Category-1 caesarean section events increased throughout the study period (471(10.7%) before COVID-19, 321(17.0%) during the first year, and 700 (20.2%) after vaccination; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (stillbirths, Apgar 5-min score < 7) among the three time periods (89(2.0%), 41(2.2%), and 49(1.4%); P = 0.065).

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, our study revealed a continuation of the upward trend in the use of NA for caesarean sections.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对土耳其公民和移民在大流行前、大流行第一年期间以及接种疫苗后单胎剖宫产麻醉技术选择变化的影响。

方法

本单中心回顾性观察研究在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的一家三级护理医院进行。研究纳入了2018年3月至2023年3月期间连续进行单胎剖宫产的9744名妇女的数据,其中7083名(72.7%)为土耳其公民,2661名(27.3%)为移民。主要结局是COVID-19大流行期间神经轴索麻醉(NA)每月使用率的变化。次要目标包括剖宫产的紧迫性和新生儿结局。

结果

在研究期间,土耳其公民和移民中使用NA进行剖宫产的数量呈上升趋势(相对比率[RR]分别为1.003,P<0.001和RR 1.005,P<0.01)。两组在COVID-19大流行开始时NA使用率均立即显著增加(RR分别为1.095,P<0.001和1.134,P<0.001)。疫苗接种的引入对NA的使用没有影响(RR分别为0.970,P=1.004和RR 1.000,P=0.99)。COVID-19大流行开始后,大流行前NA使用率的组间显著差异减小,接种疫苗后未观察到组间显著差异(分别为93.3%对90.9%,P=0.006;98.4%对97.1%,P=0.0;95.4%对95.2%,P=0.801)。在整个研究期间,1类剖宫产事件增加(COVID-19前471例(10.7%),第一年期间321例(17.0%),接种疫苗后700例(20.2%);P<0.001)。三个时间段内复合不良新生儿结局(死产、5分钟Apgar评分<7)的发生率无显著差异(分别为89例(2.0%)、41例(2.2%)和49例(1.4%);P=0.065)。

结论

在COVID-19大流行期间,我们的研究显示剖宫产使用NA呈上升趋势仍在持续。

相似文献

1
Changes in the choice of anaesthetic techniques for caesarean sections among Turkish citizens and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis.COVID-19大流行期间土耳其公民和移民剖宫产麻醉技术选择的变化:中断时间序列分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07805-8.
2
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.针刺或指压引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
3
Acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress.针对子宫收缩过速或疑似胎儿窘迫的急性宫缩抑制。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 4;7(7):CD009770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009770.pub2.
4
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
5
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
6
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being.分娩时对胎儿心率进行间歇性听诊以评估胎儿健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 13;2(2):CD008680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2.
7
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
8
Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour.引产活跃期静脉滴注缩宫素的停用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD012274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012274.pub2.
9
Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre-existing diabetes.孕前患有糖尿病的女性孕期血糖监测技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD009613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009613.pub3.
10
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.连续胎心监护(CTG)作为一种电子胎儿监护(EFM)形式,用于分娩期间的胎儿评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 3;2(2):CD006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of general vs. neuraxial anesthesia on neonatal outcomes in non-elective cesarean sections.非选择性剖宫产中全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉对新生儿结局的影响。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Mar 3;13:1518456. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1518456. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceptions and Experiences of Inequity for Women of Refugee Background Having a Baby during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Melbourne, Australia.澳大利亚墨尔本新冠疫情期间有难民背景的孕妇对不公平现象的认知与经历
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;21(4):481. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040481.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.
种族和民族差异与剖宫产全麻的接受情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350825. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50825.
4
Caesarean sections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Sydney, Australia.澳大利亚西悉尼 COVID-19 大流行前后的剖宫产术。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Dec;43(2):2265668. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2265668. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia: a scoping review.产科麻醉中的种族和民族差异:范围综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;70(6):1035-1046. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02460-z. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Choice of anesthesia technique for emergent cesarean sections during COVID-19 era in a tertiary care hospital.在 COVID-19 时代,一家三级保健医院急诊剖宫产术麻醉技术的选择。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Apr;29(4):458-462. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.97580.
7
Migrant-Native Disparities in Obstetric Neuraxial Analgesia Use: The Role of Host-Country Language Proficiency.移民-本地居民在产科使用神经阻滞性镇痛方面的差异:宿主国语言熟练程度的作用。
Anesth Analg. 2023 Oct 1;137(4):870-881. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006370. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
8
Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth for migrant versus nonmigrant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 11 countries of the WHO European region.COVID-19 大流行期间,产妇和新生儿分娩前后的母婴保健质量:在世界卫生组织欧洲区域 11 个国家进行的 IMAgiNE EURO 研究结果。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;159 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):39-53. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14472.
9
Cesarean section rate and outcomes during and before the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情第一波期间及之前的剖宫产率与结局
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Mar 23;10:20503121221085453. doi: 10.1177/20503121221085453. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study from Turkey.COVID-19 大流行对围产期结局的影响:来自土耳其的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04349-5.