Jaime-Lara Rosario B, Franks Alexis T, Nawal Nafisa, Steck Meaghan C, Chao Ariana M, Allen Carolyn, Brooks Brianna E, Atkinson Monica, Courville Amber B, Guo Juen, Yang Shanna, Marzouk Marinza, Darcey Valerie L, Chung Stephanie, Forde Ciarán G, Hall Kevin D, Joseph Paule V
University of California Los Angeles, UCLA School of Nursing, Los Angeles, CA, 20892, USA.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 May 19;9(6):107467. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107467. eCollection 2025 Jun.
As obesity rates escalate, weight-loss interventions, including low-carbohydrate (LC) and low-fat (LF) diets, have become popular. Although both diets promote weight loss, the effect of LC and LF diets on taste preference and sensitivity is less well understood.
In this study, we sought to () compare sweet and salty taste detection thresholds and preferences following a 2-wk ad libitum LF diet compared with an LC diet and () determine whether sweet and salty taste detection thresholds and preferences were associated with body weight, body mass index, blood pressure, taste relevant taste substrates (sodium and total sugar), intake, and hunger and satiety hormones (i.e., ghrelin, leptin, peptide YY [PYY] and glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1]).
We analyzed and compared taste preference and detection after ad libitum, randomized, controlled inpatient feeding study ( = 18) comparing LC (10% carbohydrate, 75% fat, and 15% protein) and LF (75% carbohydrate, 10% fat, and 15% protein) diets. Taste measures and hormone levels were measured at the end of each dietary period.
We found no significant differences in taste measures between the LC and LF diets. However, we did observe a negative association between salt preference and leptin levels during both LC (rs = 0.59; < 0.01) and LF (rs = -0.47; < 0.05) dietary period. Salt taste preference was also negatively correlated with GLP-1 after the LF diet (rs = -0.61; < 0.01). The results of this post-test study suggest that taste measures do not differ between 2-wk LC and LF diets.
The results suggest that taste measures do not differ following 2-wk LC and LF diets. However, the relationship between taste preference and hunger and satiety hormones should be explored further.This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrial.gov as NCT03878108.
随着肥胖率的上升,包括低碳水化合物(LC)和低脂肪(LF)饮食在内的减肥干预措施变得流行起来。尽管这两种饮食都能促进体重减轻,但LC和LF饮食对味觉偏好和敏感性的影响尚不太清楚。
在本研究中,我们试图(1)比较自由进食2周的LF饮食与LC饮食后的甜味和咸味检测阈值及偏好,以及(2)确定甜味和咸味检测阈值及偏好是否与体重、体重指数、血压、味觉相关底物(钠和总糖)摄入量以及饥饿和饱腹感激素(即胃饥饿素、瘦素、肽YY[PYY]和胰高血糖素样肽-1[GLP-1])相关。
我们分析并比较了自由进食、随机、对照的住院患者喂养研究(n = 18)中LC(10%碳水化合物、75%脂肪和15%蛋白质)和LF(75%碳水化合物、10%脂肪和15%蛋白质)饮食后的味觉偏好和检测情况。在每个饮食阶段结束时测量味觉指标和激素水平。
我们发现LC和LF饮食之间的味觉指标没有显著差异。然而,我们确实观察到在LC饮食期间(rs = 0.59;P < 0.01)和LF饮食期间(rs = -0.47;P < 0.05),盐偏好与瘦素水平之间存在负相关。LF饮食后,盐味偏好也与GLP-1呈负相关(rs = -0.61;P < 0.01)。这项测试后研究的结果表明,2周的LC和LF饮食之间的味觉指标没有差异。
结果表明,2周的LC和LF饮食后味觉指标没有差异。然而,味觉偏好与饥饿和饱腹感激素之间的关系应进一步探讨。本试验已在www.clinicaltrial.gov上注册,注册号为NCT03878108。