Jiang Yong, Bian Tianqi
School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1604700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1604700. eCollection 2025.
To explore the relationship between the sense of meaning of life and subjective well-being in college students' physical exercise and pro-social behavior. A scale was used to measure 626 college students, and SPSS27.0 and Process4.1 were used for statistical analysis. Results (1) college students' physical exercise, sense of meaning in life, subjective well-being and pro-social behavior were positively correlated. (2) Physical exercise significantly and positively predicted college students' pro-social behavior ( = 0.284, < 0.001); the effect value of the indirect effect path 1 was 0.0028 (physical exercise → sense of meaning in life → pro-social behavior), which accounted for 31.11% of the total effect; the effect value of the indirect effect path 2 was 0.0007 (physical exercise → sense of meaning in life → pro-social behavior). The effect value of indirect effect path 1 is 0.0028 (physical exercise → sense of meaning in life → subjective well-being → pro-social behavior) which accounts for 31.11% of the total effect; the effect value of indirect effect path 2 is 0.0007 (physical exercise → subjective well-being → pro-social behavior) which accounts for 7.78% of the total effect; and the effect value of indirect effect path 3 is 0.0013 (physical exercise → sense of meaning in life → subjective well-being → pro-social behavior) which accounts for 14.44% of the total effect. Therefore, physical exercise has a direct effect on the pro-social behavior of college students, and can also indirectly affect pro-social behavior through the sense of meaning of life and subjective well-being.
探讨大学生体育锻炼、亲社会行为中生命意义感与主观幸福感之间的关系。采用量表对626名大学生进行测量,并运用SPSS27.0和Process4.1进行统计分析。结果:(1)大学生体育锻炼、生命意义感、主观幸福感和亲社会行为之间呈正相关。(2)体育锻炼显著正向预测大学生亲社会行为(β = 0.284,p < 0.001);间接效应路径1的效应值为0.0028(体育锻炼→生命意义感→亲社会行为),占总效应的31.11%;间接效应路径2的效应值为0.0007(体育锻炼→生命意义感→亲社会行为)。间接效应路径1的效应值为0.0028(体育锻炼→生命意义感→主观幸福感→亲社会行为),占总效应的31.11%;间接效应路径2的效应值为0.0007(体育锻炼→主观幸福感→亲社会行为),占总效应的7.78%;间接效应路径3的效应值为0.0013(体育锻炼→生命意义感→主观幸福感→亲社会行为),占总效应的14.44%。因此,体育锻炼对大学生亲社会行为有直接影响,还可通过生命意义感和主观幸福感间接影响亲社会行为。