Song Wentao, He Fenglan, Deng Zhiqiang, Hu Maohong, Fang Kang, Cheng Wenjuan, Wu Jingwen, Wang Xi, Fan Guoyin, Kong Lingyan, Zhou Yisheng, Li Kangguo, Abudunaibi Buasiyamu, Kang Xiuhua, Xiang Tianxin, Li Hui, Chen Tianmu
State Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, National Innovation Platform for Industry-Education Integration in Vaccine Research, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Nanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China.
Infect Dis Model. 2025 Jun 11;10(4):1126-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2025.06.002. eCollection 2025 Dec.
Surveillance of the Avian influenza virus serves as the first line of defense, encompassing monitoring of both animals and environment. These approaches vary across countries due to differences in epidemiology and public health policies. We conducted an eight-year active surveillance program in the Poyang Lake region, a critical wintering site along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, to investigate the correlation between poultry and environmental samples. From February 2017 to June 2024, 7570 poultry and environmental samples were collected and tested in Nanchang, the largest city in the Poyang Lake region, revealing an overall avian influenza positivity rate of 40.1 %. In 2017, the poultry and environmental positivity rates were 16.9 % and 15.5 %, respectively. By 2024, these rates had risen to 69.4 % and 77.7 %, respectively, with significant and consistent annual increases observed in both environmental and poultry samples. Specifically, in poultry surveillance, chickens (54.2 %) showed higher overall AIV positivity rates compared to ducks (30.6 %), and oropharyngeal swabs (45.5 %) demonstrated greater sensitivity than cloacal swabs (22.3 %). Analysis of environmental samples revealed that, compared with smear samples (39.0 %) and fecal samples (30.9 %), sewage samples (46.5 %) exhibit superior sensitivity. Correlation and wavelet coherence analyses revealed a significant relationship between environmental and poultry samples. In scenarios where poultry sampling is unavailable, environmental surveillance can complement and potentially serve as an alternative to poultry surveillance.
禽流感病毒监测是第一道防线,包括对动物和环境的监测。由于流行病学和公共卫生政策的差异,这些方法在不同国家有所不同。我们在鄱阳湖地区开展了一项为期八年的主动监测计划,该地区是东亚-澳大利西亚候鸟迁徙路线上的一个重要越冬地,以调查家禽样本与环境样本之间的相关性。2017年2月至2024年6月,在鄱阳湖地区最大的城市南昌收集并检测了7570份家禽和环境样本,禽流感总体阳性率为40.1%。2017年,家禽和环境阳性率分别为16.9%和15.5%。到2024年,这些比率分别升至69.4%和77.7%,环境样本和家禽样本均呈现出显著且持续的年度增长。具体而言,在家禽监测中,鸡(54.2%)的禽流感病毒总体阳性率高于鸭(30.6%),口咽拭子(45.5%)的敏感性高于泄殖腔拭子(22.3%)。对环境样本的分析表明,与涂片样本(39.0%)和粪便样本(30.9%)相比,污水样本(46.5%)具有更高的敏感性。相关性和小波相干分析表明环境样本与家禽样本之间存在显著关系。在家禽采样不可行的情况下,环境监测可以作为家禽监测的补充,甚至可能替代家禽监测。