• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于同理心反驳和动机性访谈以解决患者疫苗犹豫问题的现场试验。

A field test of empathetic refutational and motivational interviewing to address vaccine hesitancy among patients.

作者信息

Fasce Angelo, Mustață Mirela, Deliu Alexandra, Holford Dawn, Karlsson Linda, Gould Virginia, Dumitra Gheorghe Gindrovel, Farcasanu Dana, Vișinescu Iulia, Verger Pierre, Lewandowsky Stephan

机构信息

University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, Marseille, France.

出版信息

NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Jul 3;10(1):142. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01197-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41541-025-01197-8
PMID:40610488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12229542/
Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is among the most concerning public health issues due to declining immunization rates worldwide. We report a mixed-methods field test of two conversational techniques that allow for an empathetic dialogue on vaccination between health care professionals and patients: Empathetic-refutational interviewing (ERI) and motivational interviewing (MI). Thirty Romanian general practitioners were assigned to an untrained control group and to two experimental groups in which they were trained in ERI or MI. After training, physicians had conversations on HPV and influenza vaccines with 334 patients who were hesitant to receive a vaccination. Patients of physicians in the ERI group demonstrated larger increases in positive attitudes toward vaccines and willingness to get vaccinated, while a greater proportion of patients in the MI group scheduled vaccination appointments. Interviews with participating physicians revealed overall satisfaction with the conversational techniques. Empathetic interpersonal communication can have a substantial positive impact on vaccination rates, especially for vaccines subject to mass misinformation campaigns.

摘要

由于全球免疫接种率下降,疫苗犹豫是最令人担忧的公共卫生问题之一。我们报告了两种对话技术的混合方法现场测试,这两种技术允许医护人员与患者就疫苗接种进行共情对话:共情反驳式访谈(ERI)和动机性访谈(MI)。30名罗马尼亚全科医生被分配到一个未经培训的对照组和两个实验组,在实验组中他们接受了ERI或MI培训。培训后,医生与334名对接种疫苗犹豫不决的患者就HPV疫苗和流感疫苗进行了交谈。ERI组医生的患者对疫苗的积极态度和接种意愿有更大幅度的提高,而MI组中有更大比例的患者预约了疫苗接种。对参与医生的访谈显示,他们对这些对话技术总体满意。共情的人际沟通可以对疫苗接种率产生重大的积极影响,特别是对于那些受到大量错误信息影响的疫苗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d4/12229542/fa75fe22ea53/41541_2025_1197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d4/12229542/6c8302430870/41541_2025_1197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d4/12229542/fa75fe22ea53/41541_2025_1197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d4/12229542/6c8302430870/41541_2025_1197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d4/12229542/fa75fe22ea53/41541_2025_1197_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A field test of empathetic refutational and motivational interviewing to address vaccine hesitancy among patients.一项关于同理心反驳和动机性访谈以解决患者疫苗犹豫问题的现场试验。
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Jul 3;10(1):142. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01197-8.
2
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
3
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
4
The complex landscape of vaccine hesitancy and hesitant adopters: Quantitative predictors and thematic insights into COVID-19 vaccine attitudes.疫苗犹豫及犹豫接种者的复杂情况:新冠疫苗态度的定量预测因素及主题洞察
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2511350. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2511350. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
5
Parental hesitancy on COVID-19 vaccination of children under the age of 16: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study among factory workers.16岁以下儿童新冠疫苗接种的家长犹豫情况:一项针对工厂工人的横断面混合方法研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0327056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327056. eCollection 2025.
6
Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.针对初级保健中管理慢性阻塞性肺疾病的卫生专业人员的教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD012652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012652.pub2.
7
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.接种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗以预防宫颈癌及其癌前病变。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3.
8
Conversational AI and Vaccine Communication: Systematic Review of the Evidence.会话式人工智能与疫苗传播:证据的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 3;25:e42758. doi: 10.2196/42758.
9
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
10
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.用于预防健康儿童流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5.

本文引用的文献

1
Difficulties faced by physicians from four European countries in rebutting antivaccination arguments: a cross-sectional study.四个欧洲国家的医生在反驳反疫苗观点时面临的困难:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Mar 12;2(1):e000195. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000195. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Political polarization and health.政治极化与健康。
Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3085-3093. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03307-w. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
From vaccine hesitancy to vaccine motivation: A motivational interviewing based approach to vaccine counselling.
从疫苗犹豫到疫苗动机:基于动机性访谈的疫苗咨询方法。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2391625. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2391625. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
4
The empathetic refutational interview to tackle vaccine misconceptions: Four randomized experiments.共情反驳式访谈以解决疫苗误解:四项随机实验。
Health Psychol. 2024 Jun;43(6):426-437. doi: 10.1037/hea0001354. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
5
Motivational interview-based health mediator interventions increase intent to vaccinate among disadvantaged individuals.基于动机访谈的健康中介干预措施增加了弱势个体接种疫苗的意愿。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug;19(2):2261687. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2261687. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
6
International adaptation and validation of the Pro-VC-Be: measuring the psychosocial determinants of vaccine confidence in healthcare professionals in European countries.国际适应与验证 Pro-VC-Be:测量欧洲国家医疗保健专业人员疫苗信心的社会心理决定因素。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2023 Jan-Dec;22(1):726-737. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2242479.
7
A taxonomy of anti-vaccination arguments from a systematic literature review and text modelling.从系统文献回顾和文本建模的角度对反疫苗接种论点进行分类。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1462-1480. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01644-3. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
Psychological profiles of anti-vaccination argument endorsement.反疫苗接种论点支持的心理特征。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 17;13(1):11219. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30883-7.
9
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A Systematic review of cognitive determinants.新冠病毒疫苗犹豫:认知决定因素的系统评价
Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Apr 30;13(1):21-35. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.03. eCollection 2023.
10
Development of PIVOT with MI: A motivational Interviewing-Based vaccine communication training for pediatric clinicians.开发基于 MI 的 PIVOT:一种基于动机性访谈的疫苗沟通培训,适用于儿科临床医生。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 3;41(10):1760-1767. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 10.