Davidson Roberta, Roca-Rada Xavier, Ravishankar Shyamsundar, Taufik Leonard, Haarkötter Christian, Collen Evelyn, Williams Matthew P, Webb Peter, Mahmud M Irfan, Djami Erlin Novita Idje, Purnomo Gludhug A, Santos Cristina, Malgosa Assumpció, Manzanilla Linda R, Silva Ana Maria, Tereso Sofia, Matos Vítor, Carvalho Pedro C, Fernandes Teresa, Maurer Anne-France, Teixeira João C, Tobler Raymond, Fehren-Schmitz Lars, Llamas Bastien
Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, The Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Genome Biol. 2025 Jul 3;26(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03622-6.
In-solution hybridization enrichment of genetic markers is a method of choice in paleogenomic studies, where the DNA of interest is generally heavily fragmented and contaminated with environmental DNA, and where the retrieval of genetic data comparable between individuals is challenging. Here, we benchmark the commercial "Twist Ancient DNA" reagent from Twist Biosciences using sequencing libraries from ancient human samples of diverse demographic origin with low to high endogenous DNA content (0.1-44%). For each library, we tested one and two rounds of enrichment and assessed performance compared to deep shotgun sequencing.
We find that the "Twist Ancient DNA" assay provides robust enrichment of approximately 1.2M target SNPs without introducing allelic bias that may interfere with downstream population genetics analyses. Additionally, we show that pooling up to 4 sequencing libraries and performing two rounds of enrichment is both reliable and cost-effective for libraries with less than 27% endogenous DNA content. Above 38% endogenous content, a maximum of one round of enrichment is recommended for cost-effectiveness and to preserve library complexity.
In conclusion, we provide researchers in the field of human paleogenomics with a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of different sequencing and enrichment strategies, and our results offer practical guidance for optimizing experimental protocols.
遗传标记的溶液内杂交富集是古基因组学研究中的一种首选方法,在这类研究中,感兴趣的DNA通常严重碎片化且被环境DNA污染,并且获取个体间可比的遗传数据具有挑战性。在此,我们使用来自不同人口统计学来源、内源性DNA含量低至高(0.1 - 44%)的古代人类样本的测序文库,对Twist Biosciences公司的商业“Twist古代DNA”试剂进行基准测试。对于每个文库,我们测试了一轮和两轮富集,并与深度鸟枪法测序相比评估了性能。
我们发现“Twist古代DNA”检测方法能稳健富集约120万个目标单核苷酸多态性(SNP),且不会引入可能干扰下游群体遗传学分析的等位基因偏差。此外,我们表明,对于内源性DNA含量低于27%的文库,合并多达4个测序文库并进行两轮富集既可靠又具有成本效益。内源性含量高于38%时,为了成本效益和保持文库复杂性,建议最多进行一轮富集。
总之,我们为人类古基因组学领域的研究人员全面了解不同测序和富集策略的优势与局限性,我们的结果为优化实验方案提供了实用指导。