Suppr超能文献

代表性在德国健康研究参与式环境中的作用:一项范围综述方案

The role of representation in participatory settings of health research in Germany: protocol for a scoping review.

作者信息

Holetzek Tim, Desch Anke, Klingler Corinna, van de Bovenkamp Hester, Holmberg Christine

机构信息

Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Hochstraße 15, 14770, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany.

Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Evidence Based Practice in Brandenburg - A JBI Affiliated Group, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00736-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participatory health research (PHR) has gained growing importance as an approach to include the perspectives of patients and communities in health research. While it is widely assumed that PHR contributes to more democratic and needs-based research, the conceptual foundations of how participation and representation are understood often remain vague - particularly in the German research context. This scoping review explores how representation is conceptualized and operationalized in participatory health-related research in Germany.

METHODS

The review follows the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and is reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search will be conducted across four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus), supplemented by manual searches in the German PartNet archive and reference tracking. Eligible studies must report on empirical, participatory health research conducted in collaboration with a German research institution. Documents will be screened and analyzed using qualitative content analysis in MAXQDA, following both deductive and inductive coding strategies. Representation will be analyzed along two conceptual lines: representation as a responsive relationship and externally ascribed representation.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

The review will map existing understandings and practices of representation in German PHR. Findings will support future methodological and normative debates around participation in health research and provide a foundation for international comparison.

摘要

背景

参与式健康研究(PHR)作为一种将患者和社区的观点纳入健康研究的方法,其重要性日益凸显。虽然人们普遍认为参与式健康研究有助于开展更具民主性和基于需求的研究,但对于如何理解参与和代表性的概念基础往往仍不明确——尤其是在德国的研究背景下。本范围综述探讨了在德国与健康相关的参与式研究中,代表性是如何被概念化和操作化的。

方法

本综述遵循JBI范围综述方法,并按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。将在四个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus)中进行系统检索,并辅以在德国PartNet档案库中的手动检索和参考文献追踪。符合条件的研究必须报告与德国研究机构合作开展的实证性参与式健康研究情况。将使用MAXQDA中的定性内容分析法对文献进行筛选和分析,采用演绎和归纳编码策略。将从两条概念线分析代表性:作为响应关系的代表性和外部赋予的代表性。

预期结果

本综述将梳理德国参与式健康研究中现有的代表性理解和实践。研究结果将支持未来围绕健康研究参与的方法学和规范性辩论,并为国际比较提供基础。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review.患者和公众参与癌症研究:范围综述。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15530-15543. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6200. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.综述的实施更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Mar;19(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验