Zhang Yong, Liu Yang, Yang Yang, Li Yiwei, Liu Lei, Huang Yang, Zhao Weiting, Liu Yong, Zhang Minghao, Zhao Yunshan, Li Chenggang
Senior Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Senior Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cancer Med. 2025 Jul;14(13):e71017. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71017.
Three-dimensional (3D) self-assembly of organoids or tumoroids based on 3D rebuilding environment (3DRE) aims to preserve the biological characteristics of original tumors, but whether the self-assembly process is influenced by 3DREs remains unknown. We here compared the colorectal cancer (CRC) tumoroids cultured using different 3DREs, including dome culture (DG), ultra-low adherence culture without Matrigel(UA) or with Matrigel (UAG), and hanging-drop without Matrigel (HD) and with Matrigel (HDG).
CRC cells were cultured to form tumoroids using DG, UA, UAG, HD, and HDG, respectively. The differences between these tumoroids were examined using light observation, histological staining, RNA sequencing, and drug sensitivity testing.
The CRC cells aggregated with each other and formed larger, converged tumoroids in the UA and the HD compared to the Matrigel. Histochemical examination revealed that the tumoroids maintained the CRC-specific characteristics of forming lumens and biomarkers, but the number of lumens decreased, and the cell arrangement was in disorder with increasing impetus of 3DREs that promote cell aggregation ranging from DM, UA to HD. RNA sequencing revealed that the tumoroids retained a similar gene expression pattern, but the oncogenes related to metastasis and poor prognosis were upregulated, and development and morphogenesis-related genes were downregulated when cultured in the UA and HD compared to the Matrigel. However, the drug sensitivity test showed that the tumoroids, regardless of the methods they were derived, maintained similar sensitivity to drugs.
We demonstrated that CRC tumoroids developed towards disordered self-assembly in adaptation to the environment without a matrix, but this adaptation did not alter tumor-specific phenotypes and drug sensitivity.
基于三维重建环境(3DRE)的类器官或肿瘤类器官的三维(3D)自组装旨在保留原始肿瘤的生物学特性,但自组装过程是否受3DREs影响仍不清楚。我们在此比较了使用不同3DREs培养的结直肠癌(CRC)肿瘤类器官,包括穹顶培养(DG)、无基质胶的超低附着培养(UA)或有基质胶的超低附着培养(UAG),以及无基质胶的悬滴培养(HD)和有基质胶的悬滴培养(HDG)。
分别使用DG、UA、UAG、HD和HDG培养CRC细胞以形成肿瘤类器官。使用光学观察、组织学染色、RNA测序和药物敏感性测试检查这些肿瘤类器官之间的差异。
与基质胶相比,CRC细胞在UA和HD中相互聚集并形成更大、融合的肿瘤类器官。组织化学检查显示,肿瘤类器官保持了形成管腔和生物标志物的CRC特异性特征,但管腔数量减少,并且随着促进细胞聚集的3DREs的推动力增加(从DM、UA到HD),细胞排列紊乱。RNA测序显示,肿瘤类器官保留了相似的基因表达模式,但与转移和预后不良相关的癌基因上调,与发育和形态发生相关的基因在与基质胶相比在UA和HD中培养时下调。然而,药物敏感性测试表明,无论肿瘤类器官的来源方法如何,它们对药物保持相似的敏感性。
我们证明,CRC肿瘤类器官在适应无基质的环境中朝着无序自组装发展,但这种适应并未改变肿瘤特异性表型和药物敏感性。