Elks Michelle, Young Jeanine, Downer Terri
Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, 6 Doherty St, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia, 4575.
University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4556, Australia.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2025 Jul 3;84:370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2025.06.049.
To examine nurses' decision-making skills managing infants with bronchiolitis receiving high flow oxygen therapy in two regional Australian paediatric unit settings.
A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used to explore decision-making models in a purposive sample of paediatric nurses (target n = 88) caring for infants with bronchiolitis receiving high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy across two regional hospital sites. Participants completed the two-part questionnaire, consisting of 1) demographic and professional characteristics and 2) the 24-item Nurse Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI). Models of decision-making were analysed overall as well as within the context of the four key phases or subscales of the NDMI.
Of the 69 eligible paediatric nurses who participated in this study, the majority (80 %) used quasi-rational clinical decision-making models; indicating that both analytical and intuitive cognitive processes were employed in the decision-making process within this clinical context. Over the four phases of decision-making the quasi-rational approach continued to be predominant. Analytical decision-making was utilised slightly more in the data collection phase and steadily decreased across the phases in this sample of paediatric nurses. Casual employment status was a significant influence on the nurse decision-making instrument score, with analytical-systematic models most used in this group.
Infants with bronchiolitis constitute a vulnerable paediatric cohort as individuals experiencing this disease may deteriorate quickly. Ascertaining how paediatric nurses make decisions is essential for promoting optimal outcomes for this vulnerable patient cohort. While this study provides a representation of paediatric nurse decision-making models in this clinical context, further research is required to confirm these findings and inform educational opportunities which support nurses to make the best decisions based on evidence.
In clinical practice paediatric nurses make numerous decisions throughout the course of a shift for this vulnerable patient cohort. Infants receiving HFNC therapy for treatment of bronchiolitis are acutely unwell and sub-optimal decision-making strategies may adversely affect patient outcomes if clinical deteriorations are not detected promptly and acted upon. It is therefore essential to ascertain how paediatric nurses make clinical decisions. This understanding will facilitate the development of quality learning resources to support effective paediatric nurses decision-making skills which will positively impact patient outcomes in a vulnerable patient cohort.
REPORTING METHOD: The checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) was utilised as the appropriate EQUATOR guideline for reporting. No Patient or Public Contribution. What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?
考察澳大利亚两个地区儿科病房中,护士对接受高流量氧气疗法的细支气管炎婴儿的决策技能。
采用描述性横断面调查设计,在两个地区医院中,对护理接受高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗的细支气管炎婴儿的儿科护士(目标样本量n = 88)进行有目的抽样,以探究决策模式。参与者完成了分为两部分的问卷,包括1)人口统计学和专业特征,以及2)包含24个条目的护士决策工具(NDMI)。对决策模式进行了整体分析,并在NDMI的四个关键阶段或子量表的背景下进行了分析。
在参与本研究的69名合格儿科护士中,大多数(80%)使用准理性临床决策模式;这表明在这种临床背景下的决策过程中,分析性和直觉性认知过程都被采用。在决策的四个阶段中,准理性方法仍然占主导地位。在数据收集阶段,分析性决策的使用略多一些,在这个儿科护士样本中,随着阶段推进其使用稳步减少。临时雇佣状态对护士决策工具得分有显著影响,该组中最常使用分析 - 系统模型。
细支气管炎婴儿是一个脆弱的儿科群体,因为患有这种疾病的个体可能会迅速恶化。确定儿科护士如何做出决策对于为这个脆弱患者群体促进最佳结果至关重要。虽然本研究展示了这种临床背景下儿科护士的决策模式,但需要进一步研究来证实这些发现,并为支持护士基于证据做出最佳决策的教育机会提供信息。
在临床实践中,儿科护士在一个班次中会为这个脆弱患者群体做出众多决策。接受高流量鼻导管治疗细支气管炎的婴儿病情严重,如果临床恶化未被及时发现并采取行动,次优的决策策略可能会对患者结果产生不利影响。因此,确定儿科护士如何做出临床决策至关重要。这种理解将有助于开发高质量的学习资源,以支持有效的儿科护士决策技能,这将对脆弱患者群体的患者结果产生积极影响。
报告方法:采用调查研究报告清单(CROSS)作为报告的适当EQUATOR指南。无患者或公众参与。本文对更广泛的全球临床社区有何贡献?