Ryan Nessa, Ganyaglo Gabriel Y K, Park Joonhee, Lin Tracy Kuo, Pozen Joanna, Mittal Avni, El Ayadi Alison M
Restore Health, Inc, 166 Prospect Place, Brooklyn, NY, 11238, USA.
Global Health Program, New York University School of Global Public Health, 708 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03823-y.
Obstetric fistula is a traumatic and stigmatized maternal morbidity often resulting in severe urinary and fecal incontinence. Women with fistula face multi-level barriers to surgical repair culminating in delays. Unfortunately, no acceptable temporizing measures to contain incontinence of urine exists. An insertable vaginal cup, alone or connected to a leg bag, has potential for improving incontinence management for women awaiting surgery or those whom surgery was unsuccessful, but effectiveness and acceptability are unknown.
We describe a four-year clinical trial and nested qualitative study to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of an insertable vaginal cup to manage fistula urinary incontinence and understand fistula management costs. Two intervention models will be compared to a control: (1) vaginal cup ('cup'), and (2) vaginal cup attached via tubing to a leg-secured urine collection bag ('cup+'). Using a cross-over design, up to 100 participants will be block randomized to one of two sequences of leaking freely (no intervention), cup, and cup + at four fistula centers in Ghana and Kenya and observed for four days (400 total observations). Data will be captured through interviewer-administered survey, clinical exam and checklist. After clinic-based assessment, participants are individually randomized for cup or cup + for home use for up to 3 months and surveyed monthly. Effectiveness will be evaluated through quantitative comparison of urinary leakage (6 h and 24 h) and patient-reported quality of life (1-3 months) between cup, cup+, and leaking freely. Acceptability will be assessed quantitatively (1-3 months) and via in-depth interview among selected trial participants (n ~ 30) and potential implementers (n ~ 20).
This implementation study will inform the effectiveness and acceptability of the cup and cup + interventions as temporizing management strategies for fistula urinary incontinence. If the cup/cup + is effective and acceptable, this study will provide insight for future trials and cost-effective assessments in settings where fistula is prevalent. Expanding the evidence base on non-surgical temporizing management options will inform comprehensive fistula care through tertiary prevention and is likely to reduce vulnerability to stigma and improve economic opportunity and quality of life.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05444504 (Date of registration: July 6, 2022). Pan African Clinical Trial Registry 202,209,466,217,416 (Date of registration: 9/22/2022). Ghana FDA Certificate FDA/CT/231 (Date of approval: 3/30/2023).
产科瘘是一种具有创伤性且会带来污名化的孕产妇疾病,常导致严重的大小便失禁。患有瘘管的女性在接受手术修复时面临多层次障碍,最终导致手术延迟。不幸的是,目前尚无可接受的临时措施来控制尿失禁。一种可插入式阴道杯,单独使用或连接到腿袋上,有可能改善等待手术的女性或手术失败女性的尿失禁管理,但效果和可接受性尚不清楚。
我们描述了一项为期四年的临床试验和嵌套定性研究,以检验可插入式阴道杯管理瘘管性尿失禁的有效性和可接受性,并了解瘘管管理成本。将两种干预模式与对照组进行比较:(1)阴道杯(“杯”),以及(2)通过管道连接到腿部固定尿液收集袋的阴道杯(“杯+”)。采用交叉设计,在加纳和肯尼亚的四个瘘管中心,将多达100名参与者按区组随机分配到自由漏尿(无干预)、杯和杯+这两种顺序之一,并观察四天(共400次观察)。数据将通过访谈员管理的调查、临床检查和清单收集。在基于诊所的评估后,参与者将被单独随机分配使用杯或杯+在家中使用长达3个月,并每月进行调查。有效性将通过定量比较杯、杯+和自由漏尿之间的漏尿量(6小时和24小时)以及患者报告的生活质量(1至3个月)来评估。可接受性将通过定量评估(1至3个月)以及对选定试验参与者(n约30)和潜在实施者(n约20)进行深入访谈来评估。
这项实施研究将为杯和杯+干预措施作为瘘管性尿失禁临时管理策略的有效性和可接受性提供信息。如果杯/杯+有效且可接受,本研究将为瘘管流行地区的未来试验和成本效益评估提供见解。扩大非手术临时管理选项的证据基础将通过三级预防为全面的瘘管护理提供信息,并可能减少遭受污名化的可能性,改善经济机会和生活质量。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05444504(注册日期:2022年7月6日)。泛非临床试验注册中心202,209,466,217,416(注册日期:2022年9月22日)。加纳食品药品监督管理局证书FDA/CT/231(批准日期:2023年3月30日)。