Plessis Anne
School of Biological and Marine Sciences University of Plymouth, Drake Circus Plymouth UK.
Plant Direct. 2025 Jul 2;9(7):e70088. doi: 10.1002/pld3.70088. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Adopting crops and agricultural practices that help sustain yield under abiotic stress will be a major element of future food security under climate change. However, little of the intensive research into the mechanisms of plant abiotic stress response has translated into improved yield stability. A suspected obstacle to translatability of research findings in this area is artificial experimental conditions, but we lack evidence to support this explanation. Here, we combined a meta-analysis and an experimental approach to compare the effect of salt stress on wheat yield, growth, and physiology across four distinct experimental settings: field/field-like conditions, potted plants in a climate chamber, in a greenhouse, and outdoors. The meta-analysis, comparing responses relative to control conditions over similar ranges of salt stress intensity, confirmed that field conditions led to more limited impact on yield than in the other three experimental settings and uncovered differences in how shoot and root biomass are relatively affected by salt stress between greenhouse and outdoors pot experiments. In our experiment, we identified very distinct responses for each of the four experimental settings, with plants outdoors accumulating more Na and proline than plants indoors, and shoot growth and yield were least affected by stress in field-like conditions and most affected in the climate chambers. Together, these results suggest that the nature of the acclimation mechanisms used by wheat to face salt stress can depend on the experimental setting. While our findings need confirmation for other crops and abiotic stresses, we recommend renewed attention to the conditions under which experiments are carried out and to favor more realistic growth conditions when possible.
采用有助于在非生物胁迫下维持产量的作物和农业实践,将是气候变化背景下未来粮食安全的一个主要因素。然而,对植物非生物胁迫响应机制的大量深入研究几乎没有转化为产量稳定性的提高。该领域研究结果可转化性的一个疑似障碍是人工实验条件,但我们缺乏支持这一解释的证据。在这里,我们结合了荟萃分析和实验方法,比较了盐胁迫对小麦产量、生长和生理的影响,涉及四种不同的实验环境:田间/类似田间条件、气候箱中的盆栽植物、温室和室外。荟萃分析比较了在相似盐胁迫强度范围内相对于对照条件的响应,证实田间条件对产量的影响比其他三种实验环境更有限,并揭示了温室和室外盆栽实验中盐胁迫对地上部和根部生物量相对影响的差异。在我们的实验中,我们确定了四种实验环境中每一种都有非常不同的响应,室外植物比室内植物积累更多的钠和脯氨酸,在类似田间条件下地上部生长和产量受胁迫影响最小,在气候箱中受影响最大。总之,这些结果表明,小麦用于应对盐胁迫的驯化机制的性质可能取决于实验环境。虽然我们的研究结果需要在其他作物和非生物胁迫下得到证实,但我们建议重新关注实验进行的条件,并尽可能采用更接近实际的生长条件。