Miller M R, Pincock A C, Grove D M
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Nov;132(5):1034-40. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.132.5.1034.
Dynamic ventilatory function was measured in 147 male and 212 female smokers with a mean age of 39.3 and 42.5 yr, respectively. The results were compared with values predicted from the results of control subjects who had never smoked, and deviation from predicted was expressed as a standardized residual (SR). Although the flow indices FMF, FEF50, and FEF75 showed a substantial group change in SR for smokers, the distribution of SR indicated changes in the majority of smokers but did not favor the identification of individual subjects as being abnormal. By contrast, the distribution of SR for FEV1/FVC%, FEV3/FVC%, and the time domain indices alpha(1) 75%, MR90%, and mu favored the identification of subjects with marked abnormalities. These volume-standardized indices allowed the identification of 2 patterns of spirometric abnormality prevalent among smokers. Pattern 1 showed changes predominantly in the first 75% of FVC and Pattern 2 showed changes generally confined to the tail of the spirogram; 15% of the female and 14% of the male smokers had Pattern 1 abnormalities, with only 4% of both the female and male smokers showing Pattern 2. These results appear more consistent with the "Dutch hypothesis" and not the "small airways hypothesis" concerning the development of chronic air-flow limitation in smokers.
对147名男性和212名女性吸烟者进行了动态通气功能测量,他们的平均年龄分别为39.3岁和42.5岁。将结果与从未吸烟的对照受试者的结果预测值进行比较,与预测值的偏差用标准化残差(SR)表示。尽管流量指标FMF、FEF50和FEF75在吸烟者的SR中显示出显著的组间变化,但SR的分布表明大多数吸烟者有变化,但不利于识别个体受试者是否异常。相比之下,FEV1/FVC%、FEV3/FVC%以及时域指标alpha(1) 75%、MR90%和mu的SR分布有利于识别有明显异常的受试者。这些体积标准化指标能够识别吸烟者中普遍存在的两种肺量计异常模式。模式1主要表现为FVC前75%的变化,模式2的变化通常局限于肺量图的尾部;15%的女性吸烟者和14%的男性吸烟者有模式1异常,只有4%的女性和男性吸烟者表现出模式2。这些结果似乎更符合关于吸烟者慢性气流受限发展的“荷兰假说”,而非“小气道假说”。