Sonowal Rituparna, Hall Nathaniel J, Stellato Anastasia C
Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 20;19:1602063. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1602063. eCollection 2025.
Chewing and mouthing are natural oral behaviors in dogs, particularly during puppyhood, yet owners report these as nuisance behaviors. The provision of appropriate enrichment items, such as scented chew toys, are often recommended to reduce these undesirable behaviors. Nevertheless, the influence of providing scented chew toys on chewing and mouthing behavior in puppies has not been investigated.
We collected data on engagement levels in dogs ( = 29) with commercially available rubber chew toys during two 5-min sessions in an observation room, with each dog interacting with both toy types (non-scented, peanut butter-scented with squeaker) on separate days. Following the sessions, dogs were randomly assigned to be provided with either the non-scented ( = 15; control) and scented squeaker toy ( = 14) for 1 week in their household. Before and after the 1-week period, owners filled out an online questionnaire detailing how often their dog engaged in chewing and mouthing behaviors at home and they rated their agreement with various statements about their dog's chewing behavior.
During observation sessions, puppies spent more time interacting with ( = 0.02) and sniffing ( < 0.0001) the peanut butter-scented squeaker toy in comparison to the non-scented toy. The frequency of owner's prompting the dog to engage with the toy during the observation sessions was higher for the non-scented toy than the peanut butter-scented squeaker toy ( < 0.0001). Descriptive statistics reveal that owners in the non-scented group were more likely to agree that their dog's mouthing or nipping was problematic in the second survey (61.5%, + 16%) compared to the initial survey (45.5%), while owners in the scented group were less likely to agree (41.6%, -28.4%) compared to the initial survey (70%). Owner reports suggest no changes in the frequency of dogs chewing on undesired items and mouthing or nipping on body parts during the 1-week period for either toy type.
The findings suggest that scent can enhance engagement with chew toys, and although chew toys did not influence owner perceptions, future research should evaluate the use of structured owner-implemented training strategies on mitigating unwanted chewing or mouthing behavior in dogs.
咀嚼和用嘴咬是狗的自然口腔行为,在幼犬时期尤为常见,但主人却将这些行为视为令人讨厌的行为。人们通常建议提供合适的丰富物品,如有香味的咀嚼玩具,以减少这些不良行为。然而,提供有香味的咀嚼玩具对幼犬咀嚼和用嘴咬行为的影响尚未得到研究。
我们在观察室中,让29只狗在两个5分钟的时间段内与市售橡胶咀嚼玩具互动,收集它们的参与程度数据,每只狗在不同的日子里与两种玩具类型(无香味、带有吱吱声的花生酱香味)进行互动。在这些时间段之后,狗被随机分配在家中使用无香味玩具(15只;对照组)或有香味的吱吱叫玩具(14只)一周。在这一周前后,主人填写一份在线问卷,详细说明他们的狗在家中咀嚼和用嘴咬行为的频率,并对关于他们狗的咀嚼行为的各种陈述表示同意程度进行评分。
在观察期间,与无香味玩具相比,幼犬与带有花生酱香味的吱吱叫玩具互动(P = 0.02)和嗅闻(P < 0.0001)的时间更多。在观察期间,主人促使狗与无香味玩具互动的频率高于带有花生酱香味的吱吱叫玩具(P < 0.0001)。描述性统计显示,在第二次调查中,无香味组的主人比初次调查(45.5%)更有可能认为他们的狗用嘴咬或啃咬有问题(61.5%,增加了16%),而有香味组的主人比初次调查(70%)更不太可能认为有问题(41.6%,减少了28.4%)。主人报告表明,对于两种玩具类型,在这一周内狗咀嚼不需要物品以及用嘴咬或啃咬身体部位的频率没有变化。
研究结果表明,气味可以增强对咀嚼玩具的参与度,虽然咀嚼玩具没有影响主人的看法,但未来的研究应该评估使用结构化的主人实施的训练策略来减轻狗不必要的咀嚼或用嘴咬行为。