Rabin Alexander S, Seelye Sarah M, Weinstein Julien B, Hogan Cainnear K, Whittington Taylor N, Cano Jennifer, Miller Shelie A, Kelley Catherine, Prescott Hallie C
Pulmonary Section, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2299.
Transitioning from metered-dose inhalers to propellant-free dry-powder inhalers could reduce health care-related greenhouse gas emissions, but the clinical difference in outcomes that may be associated with this switch is uncertain.
To evaluate the clinical difference in outcomes associated with a July 2021 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) formulary change that replaced budesonide-formoterol metered-dose inhaler with fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This within-person, self-controlled case series (SCCS) and matched observational cohort study (cohort study) used data from the US Veterans Affairs health care system from January 2018 through December 2022. Veterans who were prescribed a combination inhaler before and after the formulary change were included in both the SCCS and cohort study. Data were analyzed between April 19, 2024, and April 4, 2025.
Treatment with budesonide-formoterol metered-dose inhaler vs fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler.
Rescue medication use (albuterol and prednisone fills), emergency department visits, and hospitalizations (all-cause, respiratory-related, and pneumonia-specific) were assessed.
Following the VHA formulary change, 260 268 patients switched from budesonide-formoterol metered-dose therapy to fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder therapy. In the SCCS (median [IQR] age, 71 [62-75] years; 91% male), among patients who switched inhalers and experienced the adverse outcomes of interest, treatment with fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler therapy was associated with a 10% decrease in albuterol fills (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.90-0.91]), a 2% increase in prednisone fills (IRR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.03]), a 5% increase in all-cause emergency department visits (IRR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.04-1.06]), an 8% increase in all-cause hospitalizations (IRR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.06-1.09]), a 10% increase in respiratory-related hospitalizations (IRR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.07-1.14]), and a 24% increase in pneumonia-specific hospitalizations (IRR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.31]). In the cohort study of 258 557 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.9 [11.3] years; 94% male), those who switched to a fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler had no difference in mortality (1.89% vs 1.90%; adjusted absolute difference, -0.01 percentage points [95% CI, -0.12 to 0.10 percentage points]) but had increases in all-cause hospitalizations (16.14% vs 15.64%; adjusted absolute difference, 0.49 percentage points [95% CI, 0.21-0.78 percentage points]), respiratory-related hospitalizations (3.15% vs 2.74%; adjusted absolute difference, 0.41 percentage points [95% CI, 0.27-0.55 percentage points]), and pneumonia-related hospitalizations (1.15% vs 1.03%; adjusted absolute difference, 0.12 percentage points [95% CI, 0.04-0.21 percentage points]) at 180 days after the switch compared with matched patients who did not switch.
The study found that the VHA formulary transition from budesonide-formoterol metered-dose inhaler to fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler was associated with increased health care utilization, suggesting potential harm and the need to reevaluate this policy change.
从定量吸入器过渡到无推进剂的干粉吸入器可以减少与医疗保健相关的温室气体排放,但这种转换可能带来的临床结果差异尚不确定。
评估2021年7月退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的处方集变更带来的临床结果差异,该变更用氟替卡松-沙美特罗干粉吸入器替代布地奈德-福莫特罗定量吸入器用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘。
设计、设置和参与者:这项自身对照病例系列研究(SCCS)和匹配观察性队列研究使用了2018年1月至2022年12月美国退伍军人事务医疗保健系统的数据。在处方集变更前后都被开具联合吸入器的退伍军人被纳入SCCS和队列研究。数据于2024年4月19日至2025年4月4日进行分析。
使用布地奈德-福莫特罗定量吸入器与氟替卡松-沙美特罗干粉吸入器进行治疗。
评估急救药物使用情况(沙丁胺醇和泼尼松的配药次数)、急诊就诊次数和住院情况(全因、呼吸系统相关和特定肺炎)。
VHA处方集变更后,260268名患者从布地奈德-福莫特罗定量治疗转换为氟替卡松-沙美特罗干粉治疗。在SCCS中(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为71[62 - 75]岁;91%为男性),在转换吸入器并经历了感兴趣的不良结局的患者中,使用氟替卡松-沙美特罗干粉吸入器治疗与沙丁胺醇配药次数减少10%相关(发病率比值[IRR],0.90[95%置信区间,0.90 - 0.91]),泼尼松配药次数增加2%(IRR,1.02[95%置信区间,1.01 - 1.03]),全因急诊就诊次数增加5%(IRR,1.05[95%置信区间,1.04 - 1.06]),全因住院次数增加8%(IRR,1.08[95%置信区间,1.06 - 1.09]),呼吸系统相关住院次数增加10%(IRR,1.10[95%置信区间,1.07 - 1.14]),特定肺炎住院次数增加24%(IRR,1.24[95%置信区间,1.17 - 1.31])。在对258557名患者的队列研究中(平均[标准差]年龄为68.9[11.3]岁;94%为男性),与未转换的匹配患者相比,转换为氟替卡松-沙美特罗干粉吸入器的患者在180天时死亡率无差异(1.89%对1.90%;调整后的绝对差异为-0.01个百分点[95%置信区间,-0.12至0.10个百分点]),但全因住院次数增加(16.14%对15.64%;调整后的绝对差异为0.49个百分点[95%置信区间,0.21 - 0.78个百分点]),呼吸系统相关住院次数增加(3.15%对2.74%;调整后的绝对差异为0.41个百分点[95%置信区间,0.27 - 0.55个百分点]),肺炎相关住院次数增加(1.15%对1.03%;调整后的绝对差异为0.12个百分点[95%置信区间,0.04 - 0.21个百分点])。
该研究发现,VHA处方集从布地奈德-福莫特罗定量吸入器向氟替卡松-沙美特罗干粉吸入器的转变与医疗保健利用率增加相关,提示可能存在危害,需要重新评估这一政策变化。