• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索慢性非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物管理挑战:德国全科医生混合方法研究的结果

Exploring opioid management challenges in chronic non-cancer pain: findings from a mixed-methods study among general practitioners in Germany.

作者信息

Brinkmöller Sabrina, Poß-Doering Regina, Balzer Alexandra, Paul Cinara, Wurmbach Viktoria S, Zugaj Marco R, Wensing Michel, Straßner Cornelia

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty/Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty/Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2025 Jun 4;42(4). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf032.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmaf032
PMID:40624979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prescribing high-potency opioids for chronic non-cancer pain has increased in Germany, despite limited evidence of long-term efficacy. General practitioners write approximately 87% of all opioid prescriptions. The guideline "Long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain" (LONTS) provides recommendations for responsible opioid management, but its uptake in primary care remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates how general practitioners apply LONTS guideline recommendations and identifies barriers to implementation.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study was conducted, including an online questionnaire to detect deviations from LONTS recommendations, followed by semi-structured telephone interviews to explore barriers for guideline adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 131 questionnaires and 21 interviews with general practitioners were analyzed. 45% of questionnaire participants were unfamiliar with the LONTS guideline. Four key gaps were identified: (i) Nearly 40% of general practitioners rarely or never set individualized treatment goals for chronic pain patients; (ii) 49% preferred combining long-acting opioids at fixed intervals with short-acting opioids on demand; (iii) 17% used short-acting opioid monotherapy, considered a treatment error; (iv) 44% did not discuss opioid reduction or discontinuation after 6 months of effective pain relief. Qualitative analysis identified key barriers: lack of integration into daily routines, anticipating patients' fear of pain recurrence, and preference for personal experience over evidence.

CONCLUSION

General practitioners in Germany may struggle to implement LONTS recommendations for opioid use in chronic non-cancer pain. Targeted strategies are needed to promote and improve the adoption of these guidelines in primary care.

摘要

背景

尽管长期疗效的证据有限,但德国用于慢性非癌性疼痛的强效阿片类药物处方量仍在增加。全科医生开具了所有阿片类药物处方的约87%。“慢性非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物长期使用”(LONTS)指南为负责任的阿片类药物管理提供了建议,但其在初级保健中的采用情况仍不明确。

目的

本研究调查全科医生如何应用LONTS指南建议,并确定实施障碍。

方法

进行了一项混合方法研究,包括一份在线问卷以检测与LONTS建议的偏差,随后进行半结构化电话访谈以探讨遵循指南的障碍。

结果

共分析了131份问卷和与全科医生的21次访谈。45%的问卷参与者不熟悉LONTS指南。确定了四个关键差距:(i)近40%的全科医生很少或从未为慢性疼痛患者设定个体化治疗目标;(ii)49%的人更喜欢定期联合使用长效阿片类药物和按需使用短效阿片类药物;(iii)17%的人使用短效阿片类药物单一疗法,这被视为治疗错误;(iv)44%的人在有效缓解疼痛6个月后未讨论阿片类药物的减量或停药。定性分析确定了关键障碍:缺乏融入日常工作、预期患者对疼痛复发的恐惧以及更倾向于个人经验而非证据。

结论

德国的全科医生在实施LONTS关于慢性非癌性疼痛中阿片类药物使用的建议时可能会遇到困难。需要有针对性的策略来促进和改善这些指南在初级保健中的采用。

相似文献

1
Exploring opioid management challenges in chronic non-cancer pain: findings from a mixed-methods study among general practitioners in Germany.探索慢性非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物管理挑战:德国全科医生混合方法研究的结果
Fam Pract. 2025 Jun 4;42(4). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf032.
2
Trends in Outpatient Buprenorphine Prescribing for Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Analysis Over 18 Months.慢性疼痛门诊丁丙诺啡处方趋势:一项为期18个月的回顾性分析
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2025 Apr 8;55(3):8-19.
3
Strategies to Deimplement Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.在初级保健中停用阿片类药物处方的策略:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38325.
4
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.分娩期女性的疼痛管理:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
5
Patient-reported quality of outpatient healthcare in patients with chronic back or arthrosis pain with long-term opioid therapy in Germany.德国长期接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性背痛或关节炎疼痛患者报告的门诊医疗质量。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jun 21;26(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02881-3.
6
Patient Characteristics and Changes in Long-Term Opioid Use Among Patients With Non-Cancer Pain in Dutch Primary Care 2013-2022: A Population-Based Cohort Study.2013 - 2022年荷兰初级保健中患有非癌性疼痛患者的特征及长期阿片类药物使用变化:一项基于人群的队列研究
Eur J Pain. 2025 Jul;29(6):e70061. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70061.
7
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.成人围手术期持续静脉输注利多卡因用于术后疼痛及恢复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3.
8
Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.阿片类药物长期用于慢性非癌性疼痛的相关不良事件:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012509.pub2.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Postpartum Opioid Prescribing in Patients with Opioid Use Prior to Birth.分娩前使用阿片类药物的患者产后阿片类药物处方
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1459-e1462. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767816. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
[General practice care for patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A rapid review as part of the RELIEF project].[慢性非癌性疼痛患者的全科医疗护理:作为RELIEF项目一部分的快速综述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Apr;185:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.005. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Training-induced hypoalgesia and its potential underlying mechanisms.训练诱导的痛觉减退及其潜在的潜在机制。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Oct;141:104858. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104858. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
[The cross-sectional field "pain medicine" in medical studies at the University of Leipzig-What has been achieved? : An analysis of self-estimation of students before, during and 5 years after establishment of the cross-sectional field].
[莱比锡大学医学研究中的“疼痛医学”横断面领域——取得了哪些成果?:对该横断面领域设立前、设立期间及设立5年后学生自我评估的分析]
Schmerz. 2022 Dec;36(6):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00482-022-00665-7. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
4
Opioid deprescribing: Qualitative perspectives from those with chronic non-cancer pain.阿片类药物减用:慢性非癌痛患者的定性观点。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Dec;18(12):4083-4091. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.07.043. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Primary-Care Prescribers' Perspectives on Deprescribing Opioids and Benzodiazepines in Older Adults.初级保健医生对老年人减少开处阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的看法。
Drugs Aging. 2022 Sep;39(9):739-748. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-00967-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
6
General practitioners' attitudes towards opioids for non-cancer pain: a qualitative systematic review.全科医生对非癌性疼痛使用阿片类药物的态度:一项定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054945.
7
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Barriers to Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Among Physicians: A Physician Survey.医生实施临床实践指南的障碍:一项医生调查。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Nov 2;14:7591-7598. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S333501. eCollection 2021.
9
[Recommendations of the second update of the LONTS guidelines : Long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain].[《LONTS指南第二次更新建议:慢性非癌性疼痛的长期阿片类药物治疗》]
Schmerz. 2020 Jun;34(3):204-244. doi: 10.1007/s00482-020-00472-y.
10
[The US opioid epidemic is threatening Germany].美国的阿片类药物泛滥正威胁着德国。
Schmerz. 2020 Feb;34(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00482-019-00441-0.