• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国和印度样本中，用积极和消极情绪量表（PANAS）验证一种实时、单项主观幸福感测量方法。

Validating a real-time, single-item subjective well-being measure with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in US and Indian samples.

作者信息

Dewey George, Ando Hiroyasu, Goto Ryunosuke, Lu Megan, Miura Asako, Nishi Akihiro

机构信息

Machine Intelligence Group for the Betterment of Health and the Environment, Network Science Institute Northeastern University Boston Massachusetts USA.

University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.

出版信息

PCN Rep. 2025 Jul 6;4(3):e70140. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70140. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/pcn5.70140
PMID:40625342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12229947/
Abstract

The real-time, single-item subjective well-being (SWB) question could reflect the participants' positive and negative psychological states in our experimental setting. In other words, the single-item SWB measure exhibited sufficient construct validity for both major subcomponents of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.

摘要

在我们的实验环境中，实时单项主观幸福感（SWB）问题能够反映参与者的积极和消极心理状态。换句话说，单项SWB测量对积极和消极情绪量表的两个主要子成分都表现出足够的结构效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63e6/12229947/ada844b37380/PCN5-4-e70140-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63e6/12229947/ada844b37380/PCN5-4-e70140-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63e6/12229947/ada844b37380/PCN5-4-e70140-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validating a real-time, single-item subjective well-being measure with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in US and Indian samples.在美国和印度样本中，用积极和消极情绪量表（PANAS）验证一种实时、单项主观幸福感测量方法。
PCN Rep. 2025 Jul 6;4(3):e70140. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70140. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being and Frailty: Staying With a Positive Mind, Stepping Away From Accelerated Aging.主观幸福感与衰弱之间的关系：保持积极心态，远离加速衰老。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Mar 7;80(4). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf001.
3
Competing Models of the Structure of Subjective Well-Being: Have All Won and Must All Have Prizes?
J Pers. 2025 Aug;93(4):929-948. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12985. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
4
Motivation, meaning and well-being: Exploring gender differences and associations in participants from Iceland.动机、意义与幸福：探究冰岛参与者中的性别差异及关联
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Aug;258:105177. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105177. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Development of a Brief, Positively Framed Care Team Experience Measure.一种简短的、积极框架的护理团队体验测量方法的开发。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):680-689. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003336. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
7
Investigating the Efficacy of the Web-Based Common Elements Toolbox (COMET) Single-Session Interventions in Improving UK University Student Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial.调查基于网络的通用要素工具箱（COMET）单节干预措施对改善英国大学生幸福感的效果：随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 31;27:e58164. doi: 10.2196/58164.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响：定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验：定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”：对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in a heterogeneous sample of substance users.物质使用者异质样本中正负情绪量表（PANAS）的心理测量特性。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016 Mar;42(2):203-12. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1133632. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Screening performance of K6/K10 and other screening instruments for mood and anxiety disorders in Japan.日本心境和焦虑障碍筛查工具 K6/K10 及其他筛查工具的筛查性能。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Aug;65(5):434-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02236.x.
3
A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method.
一种描述日常生活体验的调查方法：日记重建法。
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1776-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1103572.
4
The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample.积极和消极情绪量表（PANAS）：大型非临床样本中的结构效度、测量特性及常模数据
Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Sep;43(Pt 3):245-65. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934.
5
Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.普通人群中严重精神疾病的筛查。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.
6
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.积极和消极情绪简短测量方法的编制与验证：PANAS量表
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.