Grin L, van der Steen M C, van Dijk L S, Wijnands S D N, Besselaar A T, Vanwanseele B
Fontys University of Applied Sciences, PO box 347, Eindhoven 5612 MA, the Netherlands; KU Leuven, Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences,, Tervuursevest 101, Heverlee 3001, Belgium.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Máxima Medical Center, PO box 7777, Veldhoven 5500 MB, the Netherlands; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, PO box 1350, Eindhoven 5602 ZA, the Netherlands.
Gait Posture. 2025 Jul 4;122:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.07.309.
The occurrence and the treatment of a relapsed clubfoot is a challenge in clubfoot care. Early recognition of relapse is important to minimize the invasiveness of treatment and its impact on foot functionality later in life. Gaining insight into a child's functional performance during various challenging activities will provide a comprehensive understanding of treatment outcomes which might result in crucial information for identifying relapse indicators.
This study aims to identify kinematic differences during dynamic activities between relapsed and non-relapsed Ponseti-treated clubfoot patients, and typically developing children.
Movement analysis, including the Helen Hayes model extended with the Oxford Foot model, was performed in 56 children; 14 relapsed clubfoot, 21 non-relapsed clubfoot and 21 age-matched TDC. Differences in lower extremity kinematics during walking, toe walking, heel walking and running were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping.
Compared to walking, more demanding activities accentuated task-specific deviations in children with clubfoot, such as limited plantar flexion during toe walking and decreased knee flexion during running. Children with relapsed clubfoot showed kinematic deviations in all three planes of motion across all four activities, compared with children with non-relapsed clubfoot or TDC. Differences are observed at the foot and the pelvis, as well as in the hip and knee joints.
More demanding dynamic activities aid in distinguishing between relapsed and non-relapsed clubfoot, by revealing task-specific deviations. Furthermore, our findings suggest that clinical assessment of clubfoot should include attention to compensations rather than only focusing on foot-specific characteristics.
复发性马蹄内翻足的发生及治疗是马蹄内翻足治疗中的一项挑战。早期识别复发对于尽量减少治疗的侵入性及其对患者后期足部功能的影响非常重要。深入了解儿童在各种具有挑战性的活动中的功能表现,将有助于全面了解治疗结果,这可能为识别复发指标提供关键信息。
本研究旨在确定经Ponseti法治疗的复发性和非复发性马蹄内翻足患者以及正常发育儿童在动态活动中的运动学差异。
对56名儿童进行了运动分析,包括扩展了牛津足部模型的海伦·海斯模型;其中14名复发性马蹄内翻足儿童、21名非复发性马蹄内翻足儿童和21名年龄匹配的正常发育儿童。使用统计参数映射分析了步行、踮脚尖行走、足跟行走和跑步过程中下肢运动学的差异。
与步行相比,要求更高的活动加剧了马蹄内翻足儿童特定任务的偏差,如踮脚尖行走时跖屈受限和跑步时膝关节屈曲减少。与非复发性马蹄内翻足儿童或正常发育儿童相比,复发性马蹄内翻足儿童在所有四项活动的三个运动平面上均表现出运动学偏差。在足部和骨盆以及髋关节和膝关节均观察到差异。
要求更高的动态活动有助于通过揭示特定任务的偏差来区分复发性和非复发性马蹄内翻足。此外,我们的研究结果表明,马蹄内翻足的临床评估应包括对代偿情况的关注,而不仅仅是关注足部特定特征。