Faronbi Joel O, Eromosele Blessing, Fawole Henrietta O, Idowu Opeyemi A, Akinrolie Olayinka, Akinsulore Adesanmi, Adeniji Tolulope, Ibekaku Michael Chigozie, Oyinlola Oluwagbemiga, Faronbi Grace O, Mbada Chidozie
Academy of Nursing, Department of Health and Care Professions, University of Exeter, Exeter, Great Britain.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Benin, Benin-City, Edo State, Nigeria.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 9;25(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06146-7.
Interventions that include participation in social or group connections as measures to prevent or reduce depression have received little attention. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effects of social support interventions on depressive symptoms and Quality of life (QoL) among older adults.
A detailed search of six databases comprising Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Library, African Journals Online and Web of Science Core Collections was conducted until January 2025. A review protocol was developed and registered with the PROSPERO database (ID-CRD42021283342). A meta-analysis was used to synthesize the findings of the included studies based on subgroups of social support interventions. Of the 1524 articles found from the six databases, only 16 randomised controlled trials (14 parallel and 2 cluster) were eligible for inclusion.
Social support interventions included emotional support, social engagement, instrumental, instrumental and appraisal, and social engagement and appraisal support. Meta-analysis findings indicated that social support interventions had non-significant effects on depression and QoL among older adults. Social support interventions have the potential to reduce depressive symptoms and improve QoL. However, current evidence is insufficient to determine the impact of social support interventions on depression and QoL in older adults.
将参与社交或群体联系作为预防或减轻抑郁症的措施的干预措施很少受到关注。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定社会支持干预对老年人抑郁症状和生活质量(QoL)的影响。
对包括Medline、CINAHL、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、非洲期刊在线和科学引文索引核心合集在内的六个数据库进行了详细检索,直至2025年1月。制定了一项综述方案并在PROSPERO数据库(ID-CRD42021283342)中进行了注册。使用荟萃分析根据社会支持干预的亚组对纳入研究的结果进行综合分析。在从六个数据库中找到的1524篇文章中,只有16项随机对照试验(14项平行试验和2项整群试验)符合纳入标准。
社会支持干预包括情感支持、社会参与、工具性支持、工具性和评价性支持以及社会参与和评价性支持。荟萃分析结果表明,社会支持干预对老年人的抑郁症和生活质量没有显著影响。社会支持干预有可能减轻抑郁症状并改善生活质量。然而,目前的证据不足以确定社会支持干预对老年人抑郁症和生活质量的影响。