Sun Kedi
School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 25;13:1621223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621223. eCollection 2025.
This study evaluated the sustainability of precision medical assistance policy in Guizhou Province through macro, meso and micro stakeholder analysis, combined with policy documents, statistical data and international comparison cases. The core objective is to identify barriers to long-term policy effectiveness and make evidence-based recommendations for improvement by drawing on global practice. This study used a three-tier stakeholder framework to analyze stakeholder dynamics at the macro level (national/local government), meso level (hospitals and medical teams in eastern Guizhou), and micro level (rural communities). Key findings reveal systemic sustainability challenges: at the macro level, unequal resource allocation and a "culture of dependency" on external assistance undermine local capacity building; At the meso-level, short-term personnel rotation (1-3 months on average), weak institutional management, and cultural mismatch (such as between the eastern team and Guizhou ethnic minorities) undermine service continuity; At the micro level, low policy awareness (due to poor communication in rural areas) and nonadherence to health behaviors (such as refusal to accept Western diagnoses in contrast to traditional practices) reduced the effectiveness of the intervention. Drawing on six decades of Chinese healthcare collaboration in Africa (with an emphasis on long-term capacity building and cultural integration) and Australia's modified Monash Model (MMM) of rural talent retention (through hierarchical financial incentives and career pathways), the study proposes a three-dimensional framework: (1) local talent development (e.g., scholarship and rural career trajectories modeled on MMM); (2) Cross-regional collaboration for acculturation training (inspired by the pre-deployment immersion training for African medical teams); (3) culturally sensitive interventions (e.g., integration of traditional healers into primary care). These recommendations aim to provide actionable insights into health policy in resource-poor rural areas in China and globally, moving from short-term aid to strengthening sustainable local health systems.
本研究通过宏观、中观和微观利益相关者分析,结合政策文件、统计数据和国际比较案例,评估了贵州省精准医疗救助政策的可持续性。核心目标是识别长期政策有效性的障碍,并借鉴全球实践提出基于证据的改进建议。本研究采用了一个三层利益相关者框架,来分析宏观层面(国家/地方政府)、中观层面(黔东地区的医院和医疗队)和微观层面(农村社区)的利益相关者动态。主要研究结果揭示了系统性的可持续性挑战:在宏观层面,资源分配不均以及对外部援助的“依赖文化”破坏了地方能力建设;在中观层面,短期人员轮换(平均1 - 3个月)、机构管理薄弱以及文化不匹配(如东部医疗队与贵州少数民族之间)破坏了服务的连续性;在微观层面,政策意识淡薄(由于农村地区沟通不畅)以及不遵守健康行为(如与传统做法相比拒绝接受西医诊断)降低了干预效果。借鉴中国在非洲六十年的医疗合作(强调长期能力建设和文化融合)以及澳大利亚改良的农村人才保留莫纳什模式(MMM)(通过分级财政激励和职业发展路径),本研究提出了一个三维框架:(1)本地人才培养(例如,以MMM为蓝本的奖学金和农村职业发展路径);(2)跨地区协作进行文化适应培训(灵感来自于对非洲医疗队的部署前沉浸式培训);(3)具有文化敏感性的干预措施(例如,将传统治疗师纳入初级保健)。这些建议旨在为中国及全球资源匮乏农村地区的卫生政策提供可操作的见解,从短期援助转向加强地方可持续卫生系统。