• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Nursing and Midwifery Students' Perceptions and Experiences of Using Blended Learning in Rwanda: A Qualitative Study.卢旺达护理与助产专业学生对混合式学习的认知与体验:一项定性研究
Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2022 Jun 8;5(2):203-215. doi: 10.4314/rjmhs.v5i2.9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
4
"A System That Wasn't Really Optimized for Me": Factors Influencing Autistic University Students' Access to Information.“一个并非真正为我优化的系统”:影响自闭症大学生获取信息的因素
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):171-184. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0139. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.助产士与护士合作提供分娩护理的经验:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review.远程混合式学习在护理预注册教育中的应用:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Mar;44:102775. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
2
Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Nursing Education.混合式学习在护理教育中的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 1;17(5):1589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051589.
3
Nursing students' motivation regulation strategies in blended learning: A qualitative study.混合式学习中护理学生的动机调节策略:一项定性研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Sep;22(3):602-611. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12702. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Evaluating a Blended Online Learning Model Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Quantitative Study.评估本科护理专业学生的混合式在线学习模式:一项定量研究。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Oct;36(10):507-512. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000456.
5
Improving Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes in Fundamentals of Nursing Course through Combination of Traditional and e-Learning Methods.通过传统学习方法与电子学习方法相结合提高护理专业学生在基础护理学课程中的学习成果
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):217-221. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_79_17.
6
Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: Successes, challenges & outcomes.将护理学理学学士学位课程转变为混合式学习:成功、挑战与成果
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Sep;26:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
7
A partial economic evaluation of blended learning in teaching health research methods: a three-university collaboration in South Africa, Sweden, and Uganda.混合式学习在健康研究方法教学中的部分经济评估:南非、瑞典和乌干达三所大学的合作项目
Glob Health Action. 2016 Oct 6;9:28058. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.28058. eCollection 2016.
8
Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research.健康科学研究中的定性描述方法
HERD. 2016 Jul;9(4):16-25. doi: 10.1177/1937586715614171. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education.一项系统评价,评估在线学习或混合式学习与本科护理教育中临床技能面对面学习相比的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Feb;71(2):255-70. doi: 10.1111/jan.12509. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
10
Qualitative data analysis: a practical example.定性数据分析:一个实际例子。
Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Jan;17(1):2-3. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101603. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

卢旺达护理与助产专业学生对混合式学习的认知与体验:一项定性研究

Nursing and Midwifery Students' Perceptions and Experiences of Using Blended Learning in Rwanda: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Ndayisenga Jean Pierre, Nkurunziza Aimable, Mukamana Donatilla, Murekezi Josephine, Babenko-Mould Yolanda, Kasine Yvonne, Tengera Oliva, Muhayimana Alice, Bahumura Joy, Yamuragiye Assumpta, Evans Marilyn K

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.

Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2022 Jun 8;5(2):203-215. doi: 10.4314/rjmhs.v5i2.9. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.4314/rjmhs.v5i2.9
PMID:40641948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12240447/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although blended learning (BL) is being adopted in public and private higher learning institutions (HLIs) in Rwanda, little is known about students' use of BL in their learning activities. This article describes a qualitative descriptive study of students' perceptions and experiences of BL in Rwanda's post-secondary nursing and midwifery programs in public and private HLIs.

METHODS

Thirty-three nursing and midwifery students from all public and private HLIs in Rwanda exposed to BL were invited to participate in three online focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted using a developed FGD guide with open-ended questions. Inductive content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts.

RESULTS

Three main themes emerged from the data analysis:(1) BL perceived as a new and effective teaching and learning approach, (2) Contextual challenges to the BL method, and (3) Recommendations to improve the BL method. From students' experiences, the benefits included but were not limited to the flexibility of the approach, time, and cost-saving. However, several challenges were identified, including technological issues such as lack of ICT skills and poor internet connectivity.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into the usefulness of BL in HLIs and offers recommendations on how BL teaching and learning can be improved to strengthen nursing and midwifery pre-service education quality.

摘要

背景

尽管卢旺达的公立和私立高等院校(HLIs)都在采用混合式学习(BL),但对于学生在学习活动中对混合式学习的使用情况却知之甚少。本文描述了一项关于卢旺达公立和私立高等院校中,护理和助产专业大专学生对混合式学习的认知和体验的定性描述性研究。

方法

邀请了卢旺达所有公立和私立高等院校中接触过混合式学习的33名护理和助产专业学生,参加三场在线焦点小组讨论(FGD),讨论使用一份编写好的、带有开放式问题的焦点小组讨论指南进行。采用归纳性内容分析法对文字记录进行分析。

结果

数据分析得出了三个主要主题:(1)混合式学习被视为一种新颖且有效的教学方法,(2)混合式学习方法面临的背景挑战,以及(3)改进混合式学习方法的建议。从学生的经历来看,其好处包括但不限于该方法的灵活性、节省时间和成本。然而,也发现了一些挑战,包括技术问题,如缺乏信息通信技术技能和网络连接不佳。

结论

本研究深入探讨了混合式学习在高等院校中的实用性,并就如何改进混合式学习教学以提高护理和助产职前教育质量提出了建议。