• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用冲击波碎石术预测尿石症治疗结果的机器学习方法:模型开发与验证研究

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment Using Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Model Development and Validation Study.

作者信息

Moghisi Reihaneh, El Morr Christo, Pace Kenneth T, Hajiha Mohammad, Huang Jimmy

机构信息

School of Information Technology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2022 Mar 16;11(1):e33357. doi: 10.2196/33357.

DOI:10.2196/33357
PMID:35293872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8968550/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are established treatments for renal stones. Historically, SWL has been a predominant and commonly used procedure for treating upper tract renal stones smaller than 20 mm in diameter due to its noninvasive nature. However, the reported failure rate of SWL after one treatment session ranges from 30% to 89%. The failure rate can be reduced by identifying candidates likely to benefit from SWL and manage patients who are likely to fail SWL with other treatment modalities. This would enhance and optimize treatment results for SWL candidates.

OBJECTIVE

We proposed to develop a machine learning model that can predict SWL outcomes to assist practitioners in the decision-making process when considering patients for stone treatment.

METHODS

A data set including 58,349 SWL procedures performed during 31,569 patient visits for SWL to a single hospital between 1990 and 2016 was used to construct and validate the predictive model. The AdaBoost algorithm was applied to a data set with 17 predictive attributes related to patient demographics and stone characteristics, with success or failure as an outcome. The AdaBoost algorithm was also applied to a training data set. The generated model's performance was compared to that of 5 other machine learning algorithms, namely C4.5 decision tree, naïve Bayes, Bayesian network, K-nearest neighbors, and multilayer perceptron.

RESULTS

The developed model was validated with a testing data set and performed significantly better than the models generated by the other 5 predictive algorithms. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 0.875 and 0.653, respectively, while its positive predictive value was 0.7159 and negative predictive value was 0.839. The C-statistics of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was 0.843, which reflects an excellent test.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a rigorous machine learning model to assist physicians and decision-makers to choose patients with renal stones who are most likely to have successful SWL treatment based on their demographics and stone characteristics. The proposed machine learning model can assist physicians and decision-makers in planning for SWL treatment and allow for more effective use of limited health care resources and improve patient prognoses.

摘要

背景

冲击波碎石术(SWL)、输尿管镜检查和经皮肾镜取石术是治疗肾结石的既定方法。从历史上看,由于SWL具有非侵入性,它一直是治疗直径小于20mm的上尿路肾结石的主要且常用的方法。然而,据报道,单次治疗后SWL的失败率在30%至89%之间。通过识别可能从SWL中受益的患者,并对可能治疗失败的患者采用其他治疗方式,可以降低失败率。这将提高并优化SWL候选患者的治疗效果。

目的

我们提议开发一种机器学习模型,该模型可以预测SWL的治疗结果,以帮助从业者在考虑为患者进行结石治疗时进行决策。

方法

使用一个数据集来构建和验证预测模型,该数据集包括1990年至2016年间在一家医院进行的31569次SWL患者就诊期间所实施的58349例SWL手术。将AdaBoost算法应用于一个具有17个与患者人口统计学和结石特征相关的预测属性的数据集,以成功或失败作为结果。AdaBoost算法也应用于一个训练数据集。将生成模型的性能与其他5种机器学习算法的性能进行比较,这5种算法分别是C4.5决策树、朴素贝叶斯、贝叶斯网络、K近邻和多层感知器。

结果

所开发的模型通过一个测试数据集进行了验证,其性能明显优于由其他5种预测算法生成的模型。该模型的灵敏度和特异度分别为0.875和0.653,而其阳性预测值为0.7159,阴性预测值为0.839。受试者操作特征(ROC)分析的C统计量为0.843,这反映了一个出色的测试结果。

结论

我们开发了一种严格的机器学习模型,以帮助医生和决策者根据患者的人口统计学和结石特征选择最有可能通过SWL获得成功治疗的肾结石患者。所提议的机器学习模型可以帮助医生和决策者规划SWL治疗,并更有效地利用有限的医疗资源,改善患者的预后。

相似文献

1
A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment Using Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Model Development and Validation Study.一种使用冲击波碎石术预测尿石症治疗结果的机器学习方法:模型开发与验证研究
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Mar 16;11(1):e33357. doi: 10.2196/33357.
2
Machine learning prediction of stone-free success in patients with urinary stone after treatment of shock wave lithotripsy.机器学习预测冲击波碎石术治疗后尿石症患者的结石清除成功率。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00662-x.
3
A Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithm for Assessing Stone-Free Status after Single Session Shock Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.基于机器学习算法的单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石后结石清除状态评估模型。
J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.077. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
4
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
5
Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.输尿管结石:体外冲击波碎石术治疗
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Mar;83(1):10-3.
6
[Application of machine learning models in predicting early stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones].[机器学习模型在预测肾结石软性输尿管镜碎石术后早期结石清除率中的应用]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Aug 18;51(4):653-659. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.04.010.
7
A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?100 至 300 平方毫米肾结石治疗方式比较:体外冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术等效吗?
J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):481-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0208. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
8
The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗中等大小(10 - 20毫米)肾结石的成效。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):441-4. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0857-2. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石儿童肾结石:多机构疗效和并发症的结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):516.e1-516.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.

引用本文的文献

1
Current state of AI for shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review from YAU and EAU endourology.冲击波碎石术人工智能的现状:来自YAU和EAU腔内泌尿外科的系统评价
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 11;43(1):429. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05830-y.
2
Predicting ESWL success for ureteral stones: a radiomics-based machine learning approach.预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的成功率:一种基于影像组学的机器学习方法。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01817-8.
3
Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Type and Outcome of Ureteral Stones Treatments.用于预测输尿管结石治疗类型和结果的机器学习模型
Adv Biomed Res. 2023 Oct 28;12:234. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_121_23. eCollection 2023.
4
Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.机器学习在肾结石疾病临床管理中的诊疗作用。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Dec 5;21:260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.12.004. eCollection 2023.
5
Equity within AI systems: What can health leaders expect?人工智能系统中的公平性:卫生领导者能期待什么?
Healthc Manage Forum. 2023 Mar;36(2):119-124. doi: 10.1177/08404704221125368. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
6
A Surgeon's Guide to Artificial Intelligence-Driven Predictive Models.外科医生人工智能驱动的预测模型指南
Am Surg. 2023 Jan;89(1):11-19. doi: 10.1177/00031348221103648. Epub 2022 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.马修斯相关系数(MCC)在二分类评估中优于 F1 得分和准确率的优势。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
2
A Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithm for Assessing Stone-Free Status after Single Session Shock Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.基于机器学习算法的单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石后结石清除状态评估模型。
J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.077. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
3
Machine learning to identify multigland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism.利用机器学习识别原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进中的多腺体疾病。
J Surg Res. 2017 Nov;219:173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.117. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.SWL、PCNL 和 RIRS 治疗 2cm 以下下盏结石的前瞻性随机对照研究:多中心经验:对下极结石治疗选择的更好理解。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1967-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2084-7. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
6
Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones.亨氏单位和密度在尿路结石评估与治疗中的应用价值
World J Nephrol. 2014 Nov 6;3(4):282-6. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.282.
7
Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.评估亨氏单位作为体外冲击波碎石术结果和结石成分的预测因素。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Feb;43(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0712-x. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
8
Looking for lithotripsy: accessibility and portability of Canadian healthcare.寻求碎石术:加拿大医疗保健的可及性与便携性
Healthc Policy. 2013 Nov;9(2):65-75.
9
Kidney stone size and hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children.肾结石大小和豪斯菲尔德单位预测儿童冲击波碎石术的成功。
Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
10
Predictors of success for stone fragmentation and stone-free rate after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石后结石碎裂及结石清除率的成功预测因素。
Urol J. 2012 Summer;9(3):549-52.