Chang Zeyu, McGinnity Colm J, Hinz Rainer, Wang Manlin, Dunn Joel, Liu Ruoyang, Yakubu Mubaraq, Marsden Paul, Hammers Alexander
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, King's College London, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, 27 Palatine Rd, Manchester, M20 3LJ, UK.
EJNMMI Res. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13550-025-01251-5.
Spectral analysis is a model-free PET quantification technique that treats the time-space signal as an impulse response to a bolus injection. Band-pass spectral analysis, considering specific frequency ranges, enables calculation of separate parametric maps of receptor subtype tracer binding for suitable radiopharmaceuticals such as [ C]Ro15-4513 binding to GABA 1/5 subunits. Frequency ranges are based on inspection of spectra, prior knowledge of receptor distribution, and blocking studies. The process currently requires the manual selection of frequency ranges based on the data. To enhance the efficiency of band-pass spectral analysis and extend its application to a broader range of tracers, we propose employing machine learning to automate the selection of spectral boundaries. Based on these boundaries, voxel-wise parametric maps can be generated. The machine learning models utilized in this study include 1D Convolutional Neural Network, Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, K-nearest neighbors, and Fine Tree.
The best machine learning model, Fine Tree, agreed with the manual frequency boundary in 96.92% of 3185 ROIs. The absolute mean error was 3.80% for slow component volume-of-distribution ( , largely representing 5) and 4.74% for fast component volume-of-distribution( , largely representing 5), while the relative error was 2.83% ± 43.47% for and 2.01% ± 78.04% for . The median test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient across six representative regions was 0.770 for , 0.670 for , and 0.502 for total component volume-of-distribution( ). Parametric maps applying different boundaries for different ROIs were generated.
The machine learning model developed provided accurate boundary predictions in 96.92% of regions, with minimal average bias. However, when errors occur, they can be large, owing to the sparsity of peaks. The model enables setting boundaries automatically for the vast majority of regions, followed by manual checking of the outliers. It opens the possibility of accelerating analyses e.g. of GABA 1/2/3/5 subunit binding using [C]flumazenil and of extending band-pass spectral analysis to other receptor systems.
频谱分析是一种无模型的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)定量技术,它将时空信号视为对团注注射的脉冲响应。带通频谱分析考虑特定频率范围,能够为合适的放射性药物(如与GABA₁/₅亚基结合的[¹¹C]Ro15 - 4513)计算受体亚型示踪剂结合的单独参数图。频率范围基于对光谱的检查、受体分布的先验知识以及阻断研究。目前该过程需要根据数据手动选择频率范围。为提高带通频谱分析的效率并将其应用扩展到更广泛的示踪剂,我们建议采用机器学习来自动选择光谱边界。基于这些边界,可以生成体素级参数图。本研究中使用的机器学习模型包括一维卷积神经网络、神经网络、支持向量机、逻辑回归、K近邻和精细树。
最佳机器学习模型精细树在3185个感兴趣区域(ROI)中的96.92%与手动频率边界一致。慢成分分布容积(Vₜ,主要代表GABA₅)的绝对平均误差为3.80%,快成分分布容积(Vₚ,主要代表GABA₅)的绝对平均误差为4.74%,而Vₜ的相对误差为2.83%±43.47%,Vₚ的相对误差为2.01%±78.04%。六个代表性区域的重测组内相关系数中位数,Vₜ为0.770,Vₚ为0.670,总分分布容积(Vₜₒₜ)为0.502。生成了针对不同ROI应用不同边界的参数图。
开发的机器学习模型在96.92%的区域提供了准确的边界预测,平均偏差最小。然而,由于峰值的稀疏性,当出现误差时可能会很大。该模型能够为绝大多数区域自动设置边界,随后对异常值进行人工检查。它开启了加速分析(例如使用[¹¹C]氟马西尼分析GABA₁/₂/₃/₅亚基结合)以及将带通频谱分析扩展到其他受体系统的可能性。