Suppr超能文献

正常受试者诱发呼吸困难的测量:两种量表技术的有效性

The measurement of breathlessness induced in normal subjects: validity of two scaling techniques.

作者信息

Adams L, Chronos N, Lane R, Guz A

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 1985 Jul;69(1):7-16. doi: 10.1042/cs0690007.

Abstract

The intensity of breathlessness induced by ventilatory stimulation resulting from hypercapnia, hypoxia or exercise has been quantified in normals by using the two different sensory scaling techniques of linear visual analogue scaling and ratio magnitude estimation. In naive individuals both techniques show good face validity. When related to ventilation, quantification of breathlessness is moderately reproducible with both methods, even when subjects are kept in ignorance of the pattern of ventilatory stimulation. There is a small within- and large between-subject variability with both scaling techniques; possible factors responsible are discussed. The reproducibility of visual analogue scaling when related to ventilation is independent of the nature of the ventilatory stimulus and is maintained over intervals as long as 1 week when memory for the score given is unlikely to be an important factor. The difficulties of interpreting subjective estimates of perceived breathlessness are discussed, together with the relative merits of the two scaling techniques.

摘要

通过使用线性视觉模拟评分法和比率量值估计这两种不同的感觉量化技术,已对正常人因高碳酸血症、低氧血症或运动引起的通气刺激所诱发的呼吸困难强度进行了量化。在未经训练的个体中,这两种技术都具有良好的表面效度。当与通气相关时,即使受试者不知道通气刺激的模式,两种方法对呼吸困难的量化都具有一定的可重复性。两种量化技术都存在较小的个体内差异和较大的个体间差异;文中讨论了可能的相关因素。视觉模拟评分法与通气相关时的可重复性与通气刺激的性质无关,并且在长达1周的时间间隔内保持不变,此时对所给分数的记忆不太可能是一个重要因素。文中讨论了解释主观感知呼吸困难估计值的困难,以及这两种量化技术的相对优点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验