Suppr超能文献

对洗必泰的接触性敏感?

Contact sensitivity to chlorhexidine?

作者信息

Bechgaard E, Ploug E, Hjorth N

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Aug;13(2):53-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02504.x.

Abstract

In a joint study, 2061 patients (1346 women and 715 men) were patch tested with chlorhexidine gluconate 1% in water, included in a standard test series. 48 patients (2.3%) showed a positive reaction. These were relatively more common in men (3.2%) than in women (1.9%). Positive reactions were most common in patients with leg eczema (6.8%) or leg ulcer (10.9%). Of the 48 patients who were patch test positive, 14 (2 with leg ulcer) were retested with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.01 and 1%. Only one with a leg ulcer was positive. These findings indicate that false positive reactions, known as "the excited skin syndrome", may arise from testing eczema patients in a standard series. The sensitizing potential of chlorhexidine may be very low, but the potential in patients with an eczema or ulcer of the leg has to be further evaluated.

摘要

在一项联合研究中,2061名患者(1346名女性和715名男性)用1%葡萄糖酸氯己定水溶液进行斑贴试验,该试验包含在一个标准测试系列中。48名患者(2.3%)出现阳性反应。这些反应在男性(3.2%)中比在女性(1.9%)中相对更常见。阳性反应在腿部湿疹患者(6.8%)或腿部溃疡患者(10.9%)中最为常见。在48名斑贴试验呈阳性的患者中,14名(2名患有腿部溃疡)用0.01%和1%的葡萄糖酸氯己定重新进行测试。只有一名腿部溃疡患者呈阳性。这些发现表明,被称为“皮肤兴奋综合征”的假阳性反应可能源于在标准系列中对湿疹患者进行测试。氯己定的致敏潜力可能非常低,但腿部患有湿疹或溃疡的患者的潜在致敏情况仍需进一步评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验