Sawicki Jan, Feldo Marcin, Skalska-Kamińska Agnieszka, Sowa Ireneusz
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Aleje Raclawickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Staszica 11 St., 20-081 Lublin, Poland.
Molecules. 2025 Jul 5;30(13):2864. doi: 10.3390/molecules30132864.
(1) Background: Elemental imaging methods such as XRF, SEM/TEM-EDS, LIBS and LA-ICP-MS are widely used in clinical diagnostics. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to assess the safety of both standard and innovative therapies, diagnose diseases, detect pathogens or determine intracellular processes. In addition to bioimaging, these techniques are used for semi-quantitative and quantitative analyses. Some of them also enable highly valuable speciation of analytes. However, the quality of information about elemental tissue composition depends on a number of different factors. Although the crucial parameters of quantitative analysis are the same for each technique, their impact varies depending on the bioimaging method. Due to the fact that imaging results are often crucial in clinical decision-making, it is important to clearly indicate and describe the parameters affecting the quality of results in each technique. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the influence of these crucial parameters on bioimaging results based on the methodology and results of studies published in the last ten years. (2) Methods: In order to collect relevant publications, the Scopus database was searched using the keywords "element AND imaging AND human tissue". Next, studies were selected in which methodological aspects allowed relevant conclusions to be made regarding the quality of the results obtained. (3) Results: One of the most important parameters for all techniques is measurement selectivity resulting from the complexity of human tissue. Quantitative analyses using bioimaging techniques are difficult due to the lack of suitable calibration materials. For the same reason, it is challenging to assess the accuracy of the results obtained. Particular attention should be paid to the results obtained for trace elements. (4) Conclusions: The discussed bioimaging techniques are a powerful tool in the elemental analysis of human tissues. Nevertheless, in order to obtain reliable results, a number of factors influencing the measurements must be taken into account.
(1) 背景:X射线荧光光谱法(XRF)、扫描电子显微镜/透射电子显微镜-能谱仪(SEM/TEM-EDS)、激光诱导击穿光谱法(LIBS)和激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱法(LA-ICP-MS)等元素成像方法在临床诊断中被广泛应用。根据所获得的结果,可以评估标准疗法和创新疗法的安全性、诊断疾病、检测病原体或确定细胞内过程。除了生物成像外,这些技术还用于半定量和定量分析。其中一些技术还能够对分析物进行极具价值的形态分析。然而,关于元素组织组成的信息质量取决于许多不同因素。尽管每种技术定量分析的关键参数相同,但其影响因生物成像方法而异。由于成像结果在临床决策中往往至关重要,因此明确指出并描述每种技术中影响结果质量的参数非常重要。因此,本综述的目的是根据过去十年发表的研究方法和结果,描述这些关键参数对生物成像结果的影响。(2) 方法:为了收集相关出版物,使用关键词“元素与成像与人体组织”在Scopus数据库中进行搜索。接下来,选择那些在方法学方面能够就所获得结果的质量得出相关结论的研究。(3) 结果:所有技术中最重要的参数之一是由于人体组织复杂性导致的测量选择性。由于缺乏合适的校准材料,使用生物成像技术进行定量分析很困难。出于同样的原因,评估所获得结果的准确性也具有挑战性。对于痕量元素所获得的结果应给予特别关注。(4) 结论:所讨论的生物成像技术是人体组织元素分析的有力工具。然而,为了获得可靠的结果,必须考虑许多影响测量的因素。