Casmil Irafasha C, Friesen Josh J, Bathula Nuthan V, Strumpel Anneke, Ho Chia Hao, Guez Ilana, Kong Kristen Y S, Varley Andrew J, Miyake-Stoner Shigeki J, Aliahmad Parinaz, Wang Nathaniel S, Geall Andrew J, Blakney Anna K
Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, Canada.
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Oct;12(38):e08907. doi: 10.1002/advs.202508907. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based therapies, including conventional linear mRNA (linRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and self-amplifying RNA (saRNA), are being developed not only for vaccination but also for protein replacement, gene editing, and regenerative medicine. However, these mRNA modalities differ in structure and function, and their interactions with current non-viral delivery systems influence their therapeutic efficacy. Here, the in vivo expression kinetics of linRNA, circRNA, and saRNA delivered via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) or bioreducible poly(cystamine bisacrylamide-co-4-amino-1-butanol) (pABOL) polymer are systematically evaluated. At 0.5 µg, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV)-based saRNA resulted in higher total luciferase expression than 5 µg of linRNA or circRNA highlighting its superior potency. LNPs significantly enhanced expression of non-amplifying mRNAs compared to pABOL, whereas pABOL delivery of saRNA yielded a ∼2-fold improvement over LNPs. Furthermore, saRNAs derived from New World alphaviruses expressed 2-6 times more protein than Old World saRNAs when delivered with LNPs; these differences are not observed with pABOL. These findings demonstrate that mRNA modality, saRNA genotype, and delivery platform interact to determine therapeutic protein output. This study provides actionable insights for optimizing mRNA-based therapeutics across diverse clinical applications.
基于信使核糖核酸(mRNA)的疗法,包括传统的线性mRNA(linRNA)、环状RNA(circRNA)和自我扩增RNA(saRNA),不仅正在被开发用于疫苗接种,还用于蛋白质替代、基因编辑和再生医学。然而,这些mRNA形式在结构和功能上存在差异,并且它们与当前非病毒递送系统的相互作用会影响其治疗效果。在此,我们系统地评估了通过脂质纳米颗粒(LNP)或生物可还原聚(胱胺双丙烯酰胺 - 共 - 4 - 氨基 - 丁醇)(pABOL)聚合物递送的linRNA、circRNA和saRNA的体内表达动力学。在0.5微克时,基于委内瑞拉马脑炎病毒(VEEV)的saRNA产生的总荧光素酶表达高于5微克的linRNA或circRNA,突出了其卓越的效力。与pABOL相比,LNP显著增强了非扩增mRNA的表达,而pABOL递送的saRNA比LNP产生了约2倍的改善。此外,当与LNP一起递送时,源自新大陆甲病毒的saRNA表达的蛋白质比旧大陆saRNA多2 - 6倍;用pABOL递送时未观察到这些差异。这些发现表明,mRNA形式、saRNA基因型和递送平台相互作用以确定治疗性蛋白质的产量。本研究为优化跨多种临床应用的基于mRNA的疗法提供了可行的见解。