Bollars Peter, Feyen Hans, Nathwani Dinesh, Albelooshi Ali, Ettinger Max, De Corte Ronny, Schotanus Martijn G M
Sint-Trudo Hospital, Sint Truiden, Belgium.
Sint-Dimpna Ziekenhuis Geel, Geel, Belgium.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Sep;33(9):3333-3340. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12740. Epub 2025 Jul 13.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of pre- and postoperative changes in Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to determine the rate of CPAK classification change in patients undergoing either conventionally aligned total knee arthroplasty (CTKA) or imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA). We hypothesised that PROM improvements would be comparable regardless of whether postoperative CPAK classification was preserved ("In-the-box") or altered ("Out-of-the-box") in both surgical techniques.
In this prospective randomised controlled trial, 180 patients were assigned to either CTKA or RATKA. CPAK classification was assessed pre- and postoperatively. PROMs were collected at baseline, 3, and 12 months postoperatively, including the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for daytime and night time pain, EuroQol-5D (index and VAS), and patient satisfaction.
Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Native CPAK classification was preserved in 31% of CTKA and 41% of RATKA patients. Postoperatively, CPAK II was most common (40% CTKA and 49% RATKA), followed by CPAK V. Both groups showed significant improvements in all PROMs at 3- and 12-months, regardless of CPAK classification change, and operative technique.
Short-term functional outcomes following TKA were not significantly influenced by In-the-box or Out-of-the box CPAK classification. Both CTKA and RATKA yielded comparable PROM improvements. Although altered CPAK often required greater soft-tissue release, especially in CTKA, this did not affect outcomes, suggesting alignment strategy should prioritise individual anatomy and soft-tissue balance over strict CPAK matching.
Level I.
本研究旨在探讨膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类术前和术后变化对患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的影响,并确定接受传统对线全膝关节置换术(CTKA)或无影像机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RATKA)患者的CPAK分类变化率。我们假设,无论两种手术技术中术后CPAK分类是保持不变(“框内”)还是改变(“框外”),PROMs的改善情况都是可比的。
在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,180例患者被分配接受CTKA或RATKA。术前和术后评估CPAK分类。在基线、术后3个月和12个月收集PROMs,包括膝关节协会评分、牛津膝关节评分、白天和夜间疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、欧洲五维健康量表(指数和VAS)以及患者满意度。
两组间基线特征相似。31%的CTKA患者和41%的RATKA患者保留了原始CPAK分类。术后,CPAK II最为常见(CTKA组为40%,RATKA组为49%),其次是CPAK V。两组在术后3个月和12个月时,所有PROMs均有显著改善,与CPAK分类变化和手术技术无关。
TKA术后的短期功能结局不受框内或框外CPAK分类的显著影响。CTKA和RATKA均产生了可比的PROM改善。尽管改变CPAK通常需要更大程度的软组织松解,尤其是在CTKA中,但这并不影响结局,这表明对线策略应优先考虑个体解剖结构和软组织平衡,而非严格的CPAK匹配。
I级。