Suppr超能文献

吗啡:持续静脉输注与肌内注射用于术后疼痛缓解的比较

Morphine: continuous intravenous infusion versus intramuscular injections for postoperative pain relief.

作者信息

Briggs G G, Berman M L, Lange S, Riker J, Rettenmaier M, DiSaia P

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 1985 Nov;22(3):288-93. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(85)90042-3.

Abstract

Postoperative pain was controlled in 42 patients with either continuous intravenous (iv) or scheduled intramuscular morphine following surgery for gynecologic cancers. In this double-blind study, no statistical differences were found in pain control or rate of complications between the two methods of administration. Both routes were effective in controlling pain without producing major toxicity. Initial doses were based on the patient's weight and then adjusted every 4 hr. We conclude that both methods are safe and effective but that continuous iv infusion is the preferred route because of the ease of administration, elimination of multiple intramuscular injections, and possibly more even pain control.

摘要

42例妇科癌症手术后的患者,通过持续静脉注射(iv)或定时肌肉注射吗啡来控制术后疼痛。在这项双盲研究中,两种给药方法在疼痛控制或并发症发生率方面未发现统计学差异。两种途径在控制疼痛方面均有效,且未产生重大毒性。初始剂量根据患者体重确定,然后每4小时调整一次。我们得出结论,两种方法都是安全有效的,但持续静脉输注是首选途径,因为其给药方便,避免了多次肌肉注射,并且可能能更均匀地控制疼痛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验