Yeo Young Hyun, Lee Ju Ho, Lee Keon-Hyung
Department of Public Administration/Digital Contents, Sun Moon University, Asan, Republic of Korea.
National HUSS Consortium Center, Sun Moon University, Asan, Republic of Korea.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 27;16:1563643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1563643. eCollection 2025.
When individual values, attitudes, and behaviors do not align with dominant cultural expectations, organizational societies often employ situational strength to promote behavioral conformity. While this may enhance organizational efficiency by minimizing variability in individual performance, it can also suppress self-expression and elevate stress-particularly for individuals in collectivist cultures who face stronger normative control. Notably, countries such as South Korea and Japan report lower average levels of happiness compared to Germany and Finland, despite comparable levels of economic development. This study investigates the psychological mechanisms underlying this disparity by examining the role of situational strength within cultural contexts. Using survey data from 608 participants across South Korea, Japan, Finland, and Germany, this study explores how perceptions of situational strength influence self-efficacy and happiness across different cultural orientations. The results indicate that situational strength significantly reduces both self-efficacy and happiness, with particularly strong effects in collectivist societies. Moreover, self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between situational stress and happiness, highlighting its critical psychological function. Individuals in collectivist cultures experience higher levels of situational strength due to greater societal and organizational pressure to conform, whereas those in individualist cultures report higher autonomy, reduced stress, and greater psychological well-being. These findings advance situational strength theory by demonstrating that its effects on psychological outcomes are not culturally neutral. Rather, they are shaped by sociocultural environments that modulate the experience of conformity pressure. This study contributes to cross-cultural psychology by clarifying how cultural values and institutional norms interact to influence emotional and motivational outcomes.
当个人价值观、态度和行为与主流文化期望不一致时,组织社会通常会利用情境力量来促进行为的一致性。虽然这可以通过最小化个体绩效的变异性来提高组织效率,但它也可能抑制自我表达并增加压力——尤其是对于面临更强规范控制的集体主义文化中的个体而言。值得注意的是,尽管韩国和日本的经济发展水平与德国和芬兰相当,但这两个国家的平均幸福水平却低于德国和芬兰。本研究通过考察文化背景下情境力量的作用,探究了这种差异背后的心理机制。本研究利用来自韩国、日本、芬兰和德国的608名参与者的调查数据,探讨了情境力量的认知如何影响不同文化取向的自我效能感和幸福感。结果表明,情境力量显著降低了自我效能感和幸福感,在集体主义社会中的影响尤为强烈。此外,自我效能感部分中介了情境压力与幸福感之间的关系,凸显了其关键的心理功能。集体主义文化中的个体由于社会和组织要求一致的压力更大,因而体验到更高水平的情境力量,而个人主义文化中的个体则报告有更高的自主性、更低的压力和更强的心理健康。这些发现推进了情境力量理论,表明其对心理结果的影响并非文化中立。相反,它们受到调节从众压力体验的社会文化环境的塑造。本研究通过阐明文化价值观和制度规范如何相互作用以影响情绪和动机结果,为跨文化心理学做出了贡献。