Heine Steven J, Buchtel Emma E, Norenzayan Ara
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):309-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02085.x.
Much research contrasts self-reported personality traits across cultures. We submit that this enterprise is weakened by significant methodological problems (in particular, the reference-group effect) that undermine the validity of national averages of personality scores. In this study, behavioral and demographic predictors of conscientiousness were correlated with different cross-national measures of conscientiousness based on self-reports, peer reports, and perceptions of national character. The predictors correlated strongly with perceptions of national character, but not with self-reports and peer reports. Country-level self- and peer-report measures of conscientiousness failed as markers of between-nation differences in personality.
许多研究对不同文化中自我报告的人格特质进行了对比。我们认为,这一研究工作因重大的方法问题(尤其是参照群体效应)而受到削弱,这些问题破坏了人格分数国家平均值的有效性。在本研究中,尽责性的行为和人口统计学预测因素与基于自我报告、同伴报告和国民性格认知的不同跨国尽责性测量方法相关。这些预测因素与国民性格认知密切相关,但与自我报告和同伴报告无关。国家层面的尽责性自我报告和同伴报告测量方法未能成为国家间人格差异的标志。