Dagg Kendra A, Estep Alden S, Bartz Cason E, Burgess I V Edwin R
Entomology and Nematology Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Mosquito & Fly Research Unit, USDA ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jul 14;19(7):e0013044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013044. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Mosquito vector control research relies heavily on the use of live organisms, with wild populations playing a critical role in surveillance, field product validation, and strengthening the overall efficacy and accuracy of studies. However, too often wild mosquito rearing and colony establishment in laboratory settings is consistently challenging. Here we present a modified version of a forced oviposition method for use against two different mosquito species, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. The efficacy of the technique was tested with both laboratory and wild-caught strains placed in oviposition tubes consisting of a 1.5 mL tube containing moistened cotton and a strip of germination paper. To determine if size had an impact on oviposition rate, an additional test was conducted using four different size oviposition tubes; 1.5, 5, 15, and 50 mL. Overall, the forced oviposition method was highly effective, successfully generating eggs from lab reared and field collected strains. The method was more effective with Ae. aegypti (>80% females oviposited) compared to Cx. quinquefasciatus (50-60%) in both strains. Culex quinquefasciatus holding time was longer (3-7 days) compared to Ae. aegypti females, which oviposited within 24 hrs of being transferred into tubes. Intact versus broken egg rafts affected egg hatch rate in laboratory Cx. quinquefasciatus strains but had less impact on the wild strain. Additionally, both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus displayed a claustrophilic oviposition behavior with a higher percentage of females ovipositing in the 1.5 and 5 mL tubes. This study demonstrates that the forced oviposition method can be easily adapted to other mosquito vector species and effective in producing F1 progeny needed for critical vector research.
蚊媒控制研究严重依赖活生物体的使用,野生种群在监测、现场产品验证以及提高研究的整体效力和准确性方面发挥着关键作用。然而,在实验室环境中饲养野生蚊子并建立蚊群往往一直具有挑战性。在此,我们展示了一种改良的强制产卵方法,用于两种不同的蚊子物种,即埃及伊蚊和致倦库蚊。该技术的效力在实验室菌株和野外捕获的菌株中进行了测试,这些菌株被放置在由一个装有湿润棉花和一条发芽纸的1.5毫升试管组成的产卵管中。为了确定大小是否对产卵率有影响,使用四种不同大小的产卵管(1.5、5、15和50毫升)进行了额外测试。总体而言,强制产卵方法非常有效,成功地从实验室饲养和野外采集的菌株中获得了卵。在两种菌株中,该方法对埃及伊蚊(>80%的雌蚊产卵)比对致倦库蚊(50 - 60%)更有效。致倦库蚊的滞留时间(3 - 7天)比埃及伊蚊雌蚊更长,埃及伊蚊雌蚊在转移到试管后24小时内就产卵。完整与破碎的卵块影响了实验室致倦库蚊菌株的卵孵化率,但对野生菌株的影响较小。此外,埃及伊蚊和致倦库蚊都表现出嗜幽性产卵行为,在1.5毫升和5毫升试管中产卵的雌蚊比例更高。这项研究表明,强制产卵方法可以很容易地适用于其他蚊媒物种,并有效地产生关键媒介研究所需的F1代后代。