Suppr超能文献

护理中的基因组学素养:文献的系统综述

Genomic literacy in nursing: a systematic scoping review of the literature.

作者信息

Dante Angelo, Masotta Vittorio, Paoli Ilaria, Caponnetto Valeria, Caples Maria, Laaksonen Mari, Kamenšek Tina, Petrucci Cristina, Lancia Loreto

机构信息

Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy

Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e100054. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100054.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To map the available evidence on genomic literacy among clinical nurses, nursing students and nursing faculty.

DESIGN

Systematic scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and OpenGrey. The review included studies published in English from 1 January 2001 to 28 May 2025.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies that referenced 'genomic literacy' in health-related or educational contexts and focused on nurses, nursing students or nursing faculty were included. Articles had to provide data on study design, population, setting, data collection tools and outcomes related to genomic literacy.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted and summarised data on study characteristics, including publication year, country, setting, aims, methods, population, assessment tools, outcomes and educational interventions. Findings were synthesised descriptively.

RESULTS

Of 1534 studies identified, 63 met the inclusion criteria. Most were observational (69.8%) and conducted in the USA (41.3%), focusing on clinical nurses (50.8%) in educational (47.6%) or clinical (46.0%) settings. Genomic literacy was predominantly assessed using ad hoc tools (46.0%) or the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory, revealing low literacy levels. Mean scores ranged from 5.66 to 16.21 out of 31 (18.3%-52.3% correct answers). Educational interventions demonstrated effectiveness in improving genomic knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic literacy among nurses, students and faculty remains low, with notable heterogeneity across countries. Many studies used non-standardised assessment tools with uncertain reliability and genomic literacy among nursing faculty remains underexplored. Educational interventions show promise in enhancing genomic literacy.

摘要

目的

梳理临床护士、护理专业学生和护理教师群体中有关基因组知识素养的现有证据。

设计

系统性综述。

数据来源

在PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、Academic Search Premier和OpenGrey数据库中进行全面检索。纳入2001年1月1日至2025年5月28日期间发表的英文研究。

研究选择的纳入标准

在健康相关或教育背景下提及“基因组知识素养”且聚焦于护士、护理专业学生或护理教师的研究。文章必须提供有关研究设计、人群、环境、数据收集工具以及与基因组知识素养相关结果的数据。

数据提取与综合

两名独立评审员提取并总结了有关研究特征的数据,包括发表年份、国家、环境、目的、方法、人群、评估工具、结果和教育干预措施。研究结果进行描述性综合分析。

结果

在检索到的1534项研究中,63项符合纳入标准。大多数研究为观察性研究(69.8%),在美国开展的研究占41.3%,聚焦于教育环境(47.6%)或临床环境(46.0%)中的临床护士(50.8%)。基因组知识素养主要通过特设工具(46.0%)或《基因组护理概念量表》进行评估,结果显示知识素养水平较低。平均得分在31分中为5.66至16.21分(正确答案占18.3% - 52.3%)。教育干预措施在提高基因组知识方面显示出有效性。

结论

护士、学生和教师的基因组知识素养仍然较低,各国之间存在显著差异。许多研究使用的是非标准化评估工具,可靠性存疑,护理教师的基因组知识素养仍未得到充分研究。教育干预措施在提高基因组知识素养方面显示出前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80da/12258352/b0a3bd5e1375/bmjopen-15-7-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验