Eldeeb Sherief Y, McKenna Brooke G, Lake Marilyn T, Hoffman Nadia, Lussier Alexandre A, Walton Esther, Simpkin Andrew J, Smith Andrew D A C, Zar Heather J, Stein Dan J, Dunn Erin C
Department of Sociology, College of Liberal Arts, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 14:2025.06.18.25329880. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.18.25329880.
Childhood adversity is widespread globally and is one of the strongest predictors of later psychopathology. However, the differential effects of type and timing of childhood adversities on childhood psychopathology remain unclear, highlighting the need to explore which life-course hypotheses (sensitive periods, accumulation of exposure, and/or recency of exposure) best explain these associations. Of particular importance, there is a lack of research in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where children experience higher rates of adversity relative to children in high-income countries (HIC).
Participants included 787 children and their mothers from a South African birth cohort, the Drakenstein Child Health Study. Mothers reported child exposure to adversity from birth to 8 years of age across six adversity categories. We used the two-stage Structured Life Course Modeling Approach (SLCMA) to examine life-course associations between childhood adversity exposures and internalizing/externalizing symptoms measured using the Child Behavior Checklist at age 8 years.
Maternal psychopathology, maternal adverse events, child food insecurity, and child exposure to community/domestic violence had the strongest associations with child psychopathology symptoms, with varying life-course models selected. The accumulation hypothesis best explained associations of maternal adverse events (partial =2.3%) and child exposure to community/domestic violence (partial =1.6%) with internalizing symptoms. The combined middle childhood sensitive period (age 5≤8 years) and recency hypotheses model best explained associations between maternal psychopathology and internalizing (partial =7.0%) or externalizing (partial =5.1) symptoms.
We identified that different types and timing of childhood adversity confer differential risk for childhood psychopathology symptoms in this LMIC sample. Our work has implications for strategically-timed intervention and prevention strategies to improve mental health, which may need to be specifically designed for children in LMIC.
童年期逆境在全球范围内广泛存在,是后期精神病理学最强的预测因素之一。然而,童年期逆境的类型和时机对儿童精神病理学的不同影响仍不清楚,这凸显了探索哪种生命历程假说(敏感期、暴露累积和/或暴露新近度)最能解释这些关联的必要性。特别重要的是,低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的相关研究匮乏,在这些国家,儿童经历逆境的比率高于高收入国家(HIC)的儿童。
参与者包括来自南非出生队列德拉肯斯堡儿童健康研究的787名儿童及其母亲。母亲报告了孩子从出生到8岁期间在六个逆境类别中所经历的逆境。我们使用两阶段结构化生命历程建模方法(SLCMA)来检验童年期逆境暴露与8岁时使用儿童行为清单测量的内化/外化症状之间的生命历程关联。
母亲的精神病理学、母亲的不良事件、儿童粮食不安全以及儿童遭受社区/家庭暴力与儿童精神病理学症状的关联最强,且选择了不同的生命历程模型。累积假说最能解释母亲不良事件(偏倚=2.3%)和儿童遭受社区/家庭暴力(偏倚=1.6%)与内化症状之间的关联。童年中期敏感期(5≤8岁)和新近度假说的组合模型最能解释母亲精神病理学与内化(偏倚=7.0%)或外化(偏倚=5.1%)症状之间的关联。
我们发现,在这个低收入和中等收入国家样本中,童年期逆境的不同类型和时机赋予了儿童精神病理学症状不同的风险。我们的工作对改善心理健康的策略性定时干预和预防策略具有启示意义,这些策略可能需要专门为低收入和中等收入国家的儿童设计。