Chow Kendra, Zenone Marco, Kenworthy Nora, Merid Beza, Maani Nason
Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;5(7):e0003244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003244. eCollection 2025.
In 2019, the Partnership for America's Health Care Future (PAHCF), a private health industry lobby group, launched a campaign across Meta platforms (Facebook, Instagram) to generate opposition to universal health care policies in the United States. This study investigates the content and themes prevalent in PAHCF's campaign and how these might shape public discourse and perceptions around universal health care policies. Using qualitative content analysis, 1675 advertisements were examined on Meta platforms within PAHCF's campaign. Inductive methodology was applied to develop a coding framework. Details of campaign spend and number of impressions advertisements received were also collected. The qualitative coding strategies identified three overarching campaign foci: policy targets, claims and themes, and targeted appeal groups. These elements were found to strategically and mutually reinforce one another to generate the narrative that proposed universal health care policies will be detrimental to public health, the economy, and society. Analysis identified that PAHCF engages in strategies common among unhealthy commodity industries. Social media in this instance powerfully perpetuated PAHCF messages that undermined universal health care efforts and contributed to the commercial determinants of health impacts of this industry. These findings indicate that the private health care industry is participating in wider commercial determinants of health activities, acting to protect their profits to the detriment of public health. Like other campaigns by unhealthy commodity industries, PAHCF's campaign is designed to increase doubt in the benefits of health policies, undermine public trust in government and evidence, and promote public alignment with their own messaging and preferred solutions. To counter such tactics, public health professionals need to gain a better understanding of the strategies unhealthy commodity industries utilize to deflect attention from their underlying health-harming intentions, especially through more novel platforms like social media.
2019年,美国医疗保健未来伙伴关系组织(PAHCF),一个私营医疗行业游说团体,在Meta平台(脸书、照片墙)上发起了一场运动,以引发对美国全民医保政策的反对。本研究调查了PAHCF运动中普遍存在的内容和主题,以及这些内容和主题如何塑造围绕全民医保政策的公众话语和认知。通过定性内容分析,对PAHCF运动在Meta平台上的1675则广告进行了审查。采用归纳法构建了一个编码框架。还收集了广告的投放费用细节和获得的展示量数据。定性编码策略确定了三个总体运动焦点:政策目标、主张和主题,以及目标受众群体。发现这些要素在战略上相互强化,以形成这样一种说法,即提议的全民医保政策将对公众健康、经济和社会有害。分析表明,PAHCF采用了不健康商品行业常见的策略。在这种情况下,社交媒体有力地传播了PAHCF的信息,这些信息破坏了全民医保的努力,并促成了该行业对健康影响的商业决定因素。这些发现表明,私营医疗行业正在参与更广泛的健康商业决定因素活动,其行为是为了保护自身利润而损害公众健康。与不健康商品行业的其他运动一样,PAHCF的运动旨在增加人们对健康政策益处的怀疑,破坏公众对政府和证据的信任,并促使公众与他们自己的信息和首选解决方案保持一致。为了应对这种策略,公共卫生专业人员需要更好地了解不健康商品行业用来转移对其潜在有害健康意图关注的策略,特别是通过社交媒体等更新颖的平台。