Peterson J, Johnstone E J, Mahaveer A, Smith D M
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, St Mary's Maternity Hospital, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 1;13:1552911. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1552911. eCollection 2025.
Periviable birth (22 + 0-23 + 6 weeks) presents clinicians and parents with numerous ethical, psychological and practical difficulties. The study aimed to identify key features within pre-birth periviable conversations for both professionals and parents, including priorities and challenges.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from the key stakeholder groups: neonatologists/paediatricians ( = 5), obstetricians ( = 5), midwives ( = 5) and parents ( = 7). Interviews explored their experience of periviable counselling including priorities, challenges and perceptions. Thematic analysis was used to develop across parents and professionals.
Three themes were identified summarising the parent and professional perspectives within the pre-birth periviable conversations: chronology and narrative within pre-birth conversations, different perspectives on uncertainty and the role of transparency within periviable trauma. The trauma experienced by parents through periviable birth can be compounded through poor communication practices of perinatal professionals. These themes demonstrate that the information provided to parents should consistently outline all available care options relevant to their baby, including compassionately delivered, but honest and descriptive accounts of emotive options, such as comfort care. Information should be individualised to the specific circumstances and risk factors of that individual family and incorporate discussion of topics key to the 'good parent belief' to empower parents within their role.
Perinatal professionals need to be able to utilise transparent communication, individualisation of information and understand the necessary role that narrative plays within decision-making. Future research is required to better understand the educational methods best suited to train perinatal professionals to incorporate these, and other trauma-informed care principles, within their communication and interactions with future parents.
极早早产儿出生(22 + 0 - 23 + 6周)给临床医生和家长带来了众多伦理、心理和实际困难。本研究旨在确定专业人员和家长在出生前关于极早早产儿的谈话中的关键特征,包括优先事项和挑战。
对关键利益相关者群体的参与者进行了半结构化访谈:新生儿科医生/儿科医生(n = 5)、产科医生(n = 5)、助产士(n = 5)和家长(n = 7)。访谈探讨了他们在极早早产儿咨询方面的经历,包括优先事项、挑战和看法。采用主题分析法对家长和专业人员的访谈内容进行分析。
确定了三个主题,总结了出生前关于极早早产儿的谈话中家长和专业人员的观点:出生前谈话的时间顺序和叙述、对不确定性的不同看法以及透明度在极早早产儿创伤中的作用。围产期专业人员不良的沟通方式可能会加重家长因极早早产儿出生而经历的创伤。这些主题表明,向家长提供的信息应始终概述与他们宝宝相关的所有可用护理选项,包括富有同情心地传达,但要诚实地描述情感性选项,如舒适护理。信息应根据每个家庭的具体情况和风险因素进行个性化定制,并纳入对“好父母信念”关键主题的讨论,以增强家长在其角色中的能力。
围产期专业人员需要能够运用透明沟通、信息个性化,并理解叙述在决策中所起的必要作用。未来需要进行研究,以更好地了解最适合培训围产期专业人员在与未来家长的沟通和互动中纳入这些以及其他创伤知情护理原则的教育方法。