• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验性抗万古霉素耐药肠球菌治疗对万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染患者生存的影响。

Impact of empiric anti-VRE therapy on survival in vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infection.

作者信息

Ou Tao-Hung, Yang Jia-Ling, Lin Chi-Ying, Huang Sung-Hsi, Chuang Yu-Chung, Wang Jann-Tay, Chen Yee-Chun, Chang Shan-Chwen

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Sep 3;80(9):2408-2416. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf225.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf225
PMID:40674259
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of early appropriate antibiotics in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) amid increasing incidence and limited evidence supporting empirical VRE-active therapy.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study (2010-23) involving patients with VRE BSI who received empiric Gram-positive coverage. Patients who did not receive VRE-active therapy (daptomycin or linezolid) were excluded. Based on their initial regimen, patients were classified into an empiric anti-VRE group or a glycopeptide (vancomycin or teicoplanin) group. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

We included 134 patients: 46 in the empiric anti-VRE group and 88 in the glycopeptide group. The 28-day mortality rate was 53.7%. All glycopeptide recipients switched to daptomycin, and 29 of the 46 (63%) patients in the empiric anti-VRE group also received daptomycin. Time to VRE-active therapy was shorter in the empiric anti-VRE group (0 versus 2 days; P < 0.001), and each day's delay correlated with higher mortality (0 day: 37.0%, 1 day: 57.7%, ≥2 days: 64.5%; P = 0.02). The empiric anti-VRE group had a lower 28-day mortality rate (37.0% versus 62.5%, P = 0.006). Multivariable analysis adjusting for comorbidities, steroid use, infection focus and bacteraemia severity indicated that empiric anti-VRE therapy was independently associated with lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98; P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with VRE BSI requiring empiric Gram-positive coverage, anti-VRE therapy was associated with reduced 28-day mortality compared with glycopeptides, even both groups eventually received VRE-active antibiotics. This highlights the critical role of timely, appropriate antibiotic to improve VRE BSI outcomes.

摘要

目的

在耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)血流感染(BSIs)发病率不断上升且支持经验性VRE活性治疗的证据有限的情况下,本研究旨在评估早期使用合适抗生素的益处。

方法

我们进行了一项队列研究(2010 - 2023年),纳入了接受经验性革兰氏阳性菌覆盖治疗的VRE BSI患者。未接受VRE活性治疗(达托霉素或利奈唑胺)的患者被排除。根据初始治疗方案,患者被分为经验性抗VRE组或糖肽类(万古霉素或替考拉宁)组。主要结局是28天死亡率。

结果

我们纳入了134例患者:经验性抗VRE组46例,糖肽类组88例。28天死亡率为53.7%。所有接受糖肽类治疗的患者均改用达托霉素,经验性抗VRE组46例患者中有29例(63%)也接受了达托霉素治疗。经验性抗VRE组开始VRE活性治疗的时间更短(0天对2天;P<0.001),延迟一天与更高的死亡率相关(0天:37.0%,1天:57.7%,≥2天:64.5%;P = 0.02)。经验性抗VRE组的28天死亡率较低(37.0%对62.5%,P = 0.006)。对合并症、类固醇使用、感染部位和菌血症严重程度进行多变量分析表明,经验性抗VRE治疗与较低的死亡率独立相关(调整后的OR为0.41;95%CI,0.17 - 0.98;P = 0.046)。

结论

在需要经验性革兰氏阳性菌覆盖治疗的VRE BSI患者中,与糖肽类药物相比,抗VRE治疗与28天死亡率降低相关,即使两组最终都接受了VRE活性抗生素治疗。这突出了及时、合适的抗生素在改善VRE BSI结局中的关键作用。

相似文献

1
Impact of empiric anti-VRE therapy on survival in vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infection.经验性抗万古霉素耐药肠球菌治疗对万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染患者生存的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Sep 3;80(9):2408-2416. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf225.
2
Can Oritavancin Be Used for Treatment and/or Suppressive Antimicrobial Therapy of Bone and Joint Infections Caused by Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium?奥利万星可用于治疗和/或抑制耐万古霉素屎肠球菌引起的骨和关节感染吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 14;483(7):1225-33. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003449.
3
Daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia: systematic review and meta-analysis.达托霉素与利奈唑胺治疗耐万古霉素肠球菌血症的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 13;14:687. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0687-9.
4
Impact of vancomycin resistance on attributable mortality among Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections: propensity score analysis of a large, multicentre retrospective study.粪肠球菌血流感染中万古霉素耐药性对归因死亡率的影响:一项大型多中心回顾性研究的倾向评分分析
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Sep 3;80(9):2466-2473. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf242.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of linezolid versus daptomycin for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia.利奈唑胺与达托霉素治疗万古霉素耐药肠球菌菌血症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):734-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01289-13. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
6
Risk factors for vancomycin resistance in patients with bloodstream infections: an analysis of the Munich Multicentric Enterococci Cohort.血流感染患者中万古霉素耐药的危险因素:慕尼黑多中心肠球菌队列分析
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0005225. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00052-25. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of linezolid and daptomycin for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections.利奈唑胺和达托霉素治疗万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Oct;57(10):5013-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00714-13. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
8
Similar efficacy and safety of daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis.达托霉素与利奈唑胺治疗万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染的疗效和安全性相似:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Sep;48(3):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Linezolid and Daptomycin in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infection: A National Cohort Study of Veterans Affairs Patients.利奈唑胺与达托霉素治疗耐万古霉素肠球菌血流感染的有效性和安全性比较:一项针对退伍军人事务部患者的全国队列研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 15;61(6):871-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ444. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Clinical characteristics, therapy and outcome of bloodstream infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a multicentre clinical experience.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 May 2;80(5):1241-1247. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf055.