• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级卫生保健专业人员使用蒂尔堡衰弱指标的经验:一项访谈研究。

Primary health care professionals' experiences of using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: an interview study.

作者信息

Mazya Amelie, Boström Anne-Marie, Sandlund Christina, Ekdahl Anne Wissendorff

机构信息

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Geriatric Medicine of Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Jul 18;26:e61. doi: 10.1017/S1463423625100297.

DOI:10.1017/S1463423625100297
PMID:40676963
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore primary health care professionals' (PHCP) experiences of frailty assessment with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) with focus on feasibility aspects.

BACKGROUND

Primary health care (PHC) is often the first point of contact for older people and assessment of frailty is therefore often recommended in this setting. There is however a lack of awareness of frailty in PHC. The TFI has been proposed as a suitable instrument for frailty assessment in PHC. It consists of 25 questions, where ten questions aim to identify risk factors for frailty and 15 questions assess physical, psychological, and social frailty. There are no previous studies of feasibility aspects of TFI in PHC.

METHODS

A qualitative interview study with physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists that had used TFI in face-to-face interviews during a care visit. Interviews were transcribed and the text was thematically analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

FINDINGS

Nine interviews were performed. The PHCPs experiences were expressed in one theme: . TFI was described as easy to use and providing a holistic assessment of the patient. Using the TFI was time-consuming but provided useful information for care planning. In conclusion, the TFI could be a clinically useful tool to assess frailty in PHC. The result indicates a need of educational efforts to increase knowledge about frailty and a need for primary health care to adjust to older people in order to allow care visits to include both assessment and management of frailty.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨初级卫生保健专业人员(PHCP)使用蒂尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)进行衰弱评估的经验,重点关注可行性方面。

背景

初级卫生保健(PHC)通常是老年人的首个接触点,因此在这种情况下经常建议进行衰弱评估。然而,初级卫生保健中对衰弱的认识不足。TFI已被提议作为初级卫生保健中衰弱评估的合适工具。它由25个问题组成,其中10个问题旨在识别衰弱的风险因素,15个问题评估身体、心理和社会衰弱。以前没有关于TFI在初级卫生保健中可行性方面的研究。

方法

对在护理访视期间在面对面访谈中使用过TFI的医生、护士和物理治疗师进行定性访谈研究。对访谈进行转录,并使用定性内容分析对文本进行主题分析。

结果

进行了9次访谈。PHCP的经验体现在一个主题中:TFI被描述为易于使用,并能对患者进行全面评估。使用TFI很耗时,但为护理计划提供了有用信息。总之,TFI可能是初级卫生保健中评估衰弱的一种临床有用工具。结果表明需要开展教育工作以增加对衰弱的认识,并且初级卫生保健需要适应老年人,以便护理访视能够包括衰弱的评估和管理。

相似文献

1
Primary health care professionals' experiences of using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: an interview study.初级卫生保健专业人员使用蒂尔堡衰弱指标的经验:一项访谈研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Jul 18;26:e61. doi: 10.1017/S1463423625100297.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
A qualitative interview study exploring patients' views and experiences of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the UK.一项定性访谈研究,探讨英国化脓性汗腺炎患者对治疗的看法和经历。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf046.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding frailty and its opposites from community-dwelling older peoples' perspectives: A phenomenological qualitative study.从社区老年人的视角理解衰弱及其对立面:一项现象学质性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Sep 6;7:100238. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100238. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Frailty in Older Adults.老年人的衰弱
N Engl J Med. 2024 Aug 8;391(6):538-548. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2301292.
3
Translation and Validation of the Swedish Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.《蒂尔堡衰弱指标瑞典语版本的翻译与验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;11(16):2309. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162309.
4
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: A psychometric systematic review.蒂尔堡衰弱指标:一项心理测量学系统评价。
Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Apr;76:101588. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101588. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Routinely asking patients about income in primary care: a mixed-methods study.在初级保健中定期询问患者收入情况:一项混合方法研究。
BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 22;6(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0090. Print 2022 Mar.
6
Assessing Frailty with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): A Review of Reliability and Validity.使用 Tilburg 衰弱指标(TFI)评估衰弱:可靠性和有效性的综述。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 May 18;16:863-875. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S298191. eCollection 2021.
7
Managing frailty in an Irish primary care setting: A qualitative study of perspectives of healthcare professionals and frail older patients.爱尔兰初级保健环境中衰弱的管理:对医疗保健专业人员和体弱老年患者观点的定性研究。
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2021 Mar 1;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-06-001. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程中的抽象和解释。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103632. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Feasibility and acceptability of commonly used screening instruments to identify frailty among community-dwelling older people: a mixed methods study.社区居住老年人中常用筛查工具识别虚弱的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01551-6.
10
Preventing frailty in older people: An exploration of primary care professionals' experiences.预防老年人虚弱:初级保健专业人员的经验探索。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Jun;15(2):e12297. doi: 10.1111/opn.12297. Epub 2019 Dec 24.