• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis.

作者信息

Dagan R, Powell K R, Hall C B, Menegus M A

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1985 Dec;107(6):855-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80175-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80175-x
PMID:4067741
Abstract

During a 2-year period, 233 infants younger than 3 months were prospectively studied to determine whether physical examination, white blood cell and band count, and urinalysis could identify infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infections. Only previously healthy infants (born at term, no perinatal complications, no previous or underlying diseases, no previous antibiotic therapy) were studied. One hundred forty-four (62%) of the 233 infants were considered unlikely to have serious bacterial infections, because they did not have physical findings consistent with ear, soft tissue, or skeletal infection, had between 5000 and 15,000 white blood cells/mm3, had less than 1500 bands/mm3, and urinalysis yielded normal findings. Eighty-nine (38%) infants did not meet one or more of these criteria and were classified as being at high risk for serious bacterial infection. Only one (0.7%) of the 144 infants in the low-risk group had a serious infection, compared with 22 (25%) of the 89 infants in the high risk group (P less than 0.0001). None of the infants in the low-risk group had bacteremia, compared with nine (10%) of the 89 infants in the high-risk group (P less than 0.0005). Neither traditional risk factors, such as age, sex, and temperature, nor other signs, symptoms, or laboratory findings were adequate predictors of serious bacterial infection. We conclude that previously healthy infants younger than 3 months with an acute illness are unlikely to have serious bacterial infection if they have no findings consistent with ear, soft tissue, or skeletal infections and have normal white blood cell and band form counts and normal urine findings.

摘要

相似文献

1
Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis.
J Pediatr. 1985 Dec;107(6):855-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80175-x.
2
Ambulatory care of febrile infants younger than 2 months of age classified as being at low risk for having serious bacterial infections.对2个月以下被归类为患严重细菌感染低风险的发热婴儿的门诊护理。
J Pediatr. 1988 Mar;112(3):355-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80312-3.
3
Enhanced urinalysis improves identification of febrile infants ages 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial illness.强化尿液分析有助于识别60日龄及以下、患严重细菌性疾病风险较低的发热婴儿。
Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):866-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.866.
4
Identification of febrile neonates unlikely to have bacterial infections.识别不太可能患有细菌感染的发热新生儿。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Jan;16(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199701000-00013.
5
Outpatient management of selected infants younger than two months of age evaluated for possible sepsis.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990 Jun;9(6):385-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199006000-00003.
6
Diagnostic value of IL-6, CRP, WBC, and absolute neutrophil count to predict serious bacterial infection in febrile infants.IL-6、CRP、白细胞计数及中性粒细胞绝对值对预测发热婴儿严重细菌感染的诊断价值。
Acta Med Iran. 2015 Jul;53(7):408-11.
7
The evaluation and treatment of the febrile infant.
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1983 Mar-Apr;2(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198303000-00013.
8
Febrile infants at low risk for serious bacterial infection--an appraisal of the Rochester criteria and implications for management. Febrile Infant Collaborative Study Group.严重细菌感染低风险的发热婴儿——罗切斯特标准评估及其管理意义。发热婴儿协作研究组。
Pediatrics. 1994 Sep;94(3):390-6.
9
Predictive model for serious bacterial infections among infants younger than 3 months of age.3个月以下婴儿严重细菌感染的预测模型
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):311-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.311.
10
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of outpatient strategies for management of febrile infants.发热婴儿门诊管理策略的临床效果及成本效益
Pediatrics. 1992 Jun;89(6 Pt 2):1135-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Care of Young Febrile Infants in Hawai'i: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Hospitalizations and Procedures.改善夏威夷州低热婴儿的护理:一项旨在减少不必要住院和医疗程序的质量改进计划。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2025 Jun;84(6):48-58. doi: 10.62547/YMXL1170.
2
Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for serious bacterial infections in febrile young infants.基于机器学习的发热小婴儿严重细菌感染预测模型的开发。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jul 30;9(1):e003548. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003548.
3
Elevated band count in the pediatric patient.
儿科患者的杆状核细胞计数升高。
Front Pediatr. 2025 May 9;13:1483929. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1483929. eCollection 2025.
4
Approach to Short Duration Fever in Children in Office Practice.基层医疗中儿童短期发热的处理方法
Indian J Pediatr. 2025 May;92(5):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s12098-025-05470-5. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
5
Entering the Icy Waters of Viral Testing and Infant Hypothermia.踏入病毒检测与婴儿体温过低的冰冷水域。
J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2024 Mar 13;11:200103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2024.200103. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Impact of inadequate empirical antibiotic treatment on outcome of non-critically ill children with bacterial infections.经验性抗生素治疗不足对非危重症细菌感染患儿结局的影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 May 11;24(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04793-0.
7
Respiratory viral detection in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of young febrile infants.发热婴幼儿血浆和脑脊液(CSF)中呼吸道病毒的检测
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Feb 1;18(2):e13250. doi: 10.1111/irv.13250. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
CA FIRST (California Febrile Infant Risk Stratification Tool) Algorithm Development in a Learning Health System.CA FIRST(加利福尼亚发热婴儿风险分层工具)在学习型健康系统中的算法开发。
Perm J. 2023 Sep 15;27(3):92-98. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.030. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
9
Serious Bacterial Infections in Preterm Infants: Should Their Age Be "Corrected"?早产儿的严重细菌感染:其年龄是否应“矫正”?
J Clin Med. 2023 May 1;12(9):3242. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093242.
10
Boston Febrile Infant Algorithm 2.0: Improving Care of the Febrile Infant 1-2 Months of Age.《波士顿发热婴儿算法2.0:改善1至2月龄发热婴儿的护理》
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022 Oct 27;7(6):e616. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000616. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.