Doki Shotaro, Hori Daisuke, Ishitsuka Mami, Matsuura Asako, Tsukada Hotaka, Migaki Wakako, Kanai Norishige, Al Assaad Reem, Sasahara Shin-Ichiro
Occupational Psychiatry and Aerospace Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN.
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 17;17(6):e86189. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86189. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Introduction Assessing fitness for work among employees with mental health disorders presents significant challenges. While it is fundamentally assumed that employees must be capable of adequately fulfilling their job responsibilities, occupational health professionals frequently encounter difficulties in making such determinations. This study aims to elucidate the factors considered by occupational physicians, particularly those specializing in psychiatry when evaluating the work eligibility of employees experiencing mental health issues. Methods We analyzed a subset of occupational physician interview records collected over a 14.5-year period at a higher education institution. A total of 1,381 interviews involving 184 individuals were included. For two groups, employees currently working and those on leave, we used the occupational physician's decision as the dependent variable. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was employed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of factors associated with the physician's decision to recommend sick leave versus continued work without leave. Results Among employees currently working, factors associated with the occupational physician's decision to recommend sick leave rather than continued work included other occupations (OR [95% CI] = 5.43 [1.16, 25.42]), reduced sense of sleep quality (OR [95% CI] = 4.22 [1.07, 16.67]), and loss of appetite (OR [95% CI] = 6.81 [1.36, 34.2]). Among employees on sick leave, the only factor associated with a return-to-work decision, as opposed to continued sick leave, was the total duration of prior sick leave (in months) (OR [95% CI] = 0.94 [0.91, 0.96]). Conclusions The present study revealed that occupational physicians specializing in psychiatry place significant emphasis on lifestyle factors such as sleep and appetite when assessing fitness for work. When occupational physicians assessed fitness to return to work for employees on sick leave, they focused on the duration of the leave, which could serve as a potential risk factor for relapse.
引言 评估患有精神健康障碍的员工的工作适应性存在重大挑战。虽然从根本上假设员工必须有能力充分履行其工作职责,但职业健康专业人员在做出此类判断时经常遇到困难。本研究旨在阐明职业医生,特别是精神科专科医生在评估有精神健康问题的员工的工作资格时所考虑的因素。方法 我们分析了在一所高等教育机构14.5年期间收集的职业医生访谈记录的一个子集。总共包括涉及184人的1381次访谈。对于两组,即目前在职的员工和休假的员工,我们将职业医生的决定作为因变量。采用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)来估计与医生建议病假而非无假继续工作的决定相关的因素的比值比(OR)。结果 在目前在职的员工中,与职业医生建议病假而非继续工作的决定相关的因素包括其他职业(OR [95% CI] = 5.43 [1.16, 25.42])、睡眠质量下降(OR [95% CI] = 4.22 [1.07, 16.67])和食欲不振(OR [95% CI] = 6.81 [1.36, 34.2])。在休病假的员工中,与返回工作决定(而非继续休病假)相关的唯一因素是之前病假的总时长(以月为单位)(OR [95% CI] = 0.94 [0.91, 0.96])。结论 本研究表明专门从事精神科的职业医生在评估工作适应性时非常重视睡眠和食欲等生活方式因素。当职业医生评估休病假员工返回工作的适应性时,他们关注休假时长,这可能是复发的一个潜在风险因素。