• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Structure-Based Classification Approach.基于结构的分类方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2025 Jul 14:01466216251360544. doi: 10.1177/01466216251360544.
2
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
6
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
A Scoping Review of the Observed and Perceived Functional Impacts Associated With Language and Learning Disorders in School-Aged Children.一项关于学龄儿童语言和学习障碍相关的观察到的和感知到的功能影响的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70086.
9
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
10
Leveraging a foundation model zoo for cell similarity search in oncological microscopy across devices.利用基础模型库进行跨设备肿瘤显微镜检查中的细胞相似性搜索。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1480384. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1480384. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Taste the music: Modality-general representation of affective states derived from auditory and gustatory stimuli.品尝音乐:源自听觉和味觉刺激的情感状态的模态综合表现。
Cognition. 2024 Aug;249:105830. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105830. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.重新思考情绪表达:从人类面部动作推断情绪的挑战。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2019 Jul;20(1):1-68. doi: 10.1177/1529100619832930.
3
Representational models: A common framework for understanding encoding, pattern-component, and representational-similarity analysis.表征模型:理解编码、模式成分和表征相似性分析的通用框架。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Apr 24;13(4):e1005508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.估计心理网络及其准确性:教程论文。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.
5
Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology.网络分析:精神病理学结构的综合方法。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:91-121. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608.
6
Functional and effective connectivity: a review.功能连接和有效连接:综述。
Brain Connect. 2011;1(1):13-36. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008.
7
Network modelling methods for FMRI.功能磁共振成像的网络建模方法。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):875-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
8
Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience.表象相似性分析——连接系统神经科学的分支。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2008 Nov 24;2:4. doi: 10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008. eCollection 2008.
9
Emotional intelligence: new ability or eclectic traits?情商:新能力还是综合特质?
Am Psychol. 2008 Sep;63(6):503-17. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.503.
10
What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.主观李克特量表的跨文化比较存在什么问题?:参照群体效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):903-18.

基于结构的分类方法。

Structure-Based Classification Approach.

作者信息

Kim Jongwan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2025 Jul 14:01466216251360544. doi: 10.1177/01466216251360544.

DOI:10.1177/01466216251360544
PMID:40678359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12264251/
Abstract

This study introduces a novel structure-based classification (SBC) framework that leverages pairwise distance representations of rating data to enhance classification performance while mitigating individual differences in scale usage. Unlike conventional feature-based approaches that rely on absolute rating scores, SBC transforms rating data into structured representations by computing pairwise distances between rating dimensions. This transformation captures the relational structure of ratings, ensuring consistency between training and test datasets and enhancing model robustness. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, we conducted a simulation study in which participants rated stimuli across multiple affective dimensions, with systematic individual differences in scale usage. The results demonstrated that SBC successfully classified affective stimuli despite these variations, performing comparably to traditional classification methods. The findings suggest that relational structures among rating dimensions contain meaningful information for affective classification, akin to functional connectivity approaches in cognitive neuroscience. By focusing on rating interdependencies as well as absolute values, SBC provides a robust and generalizable method for analyzing subjective responses, with implications for psychological research.

摘要

本研究引入了一种新颖的基于结构的分类(SBC)框架,该框架利用评分数据的成对距离表示来提高分类性能,同时减轻量表使用中的个体差异。与依赖绝对评分分数的传统基于特征的方法不同,SBC通过计算评分维度之间的成对距离将评分数据转换为结构化表示。这种转换捕捉了评分的关系结构,确保训练数据集和测试数据集之间的一致性,并增强模型的稳健性。为了评估这种方法的有效性,我们进行了一项模拟研究,其中参与者对多个情感维度的刺激进行评分,在量表使用上存在系统的个体差异。结果表明,尽管存在这些差异,SBC仍成功地对情感刺激进行了分类,其表现与传统分类方法相当。研究结果表明,评分维度之间的关系结构包含了情感分类的有意义信息,类似于认知神经科学中的功能连接方法。通过关注评分的相互依赖性以及绝对值,SBC提供了一种强大且可推广的方法来分析主观反应,对心理学研究具有启示意义。