Skvortsova Aleksandrina, Stiel Stephanie, Afshar Kambiz, Röwer Hanna A A, Bausewein Claudia, Hartigan Irene, Saab Mohamad M, Pereira Sandra Martins, Hernández-Marrero Pablo, Hrdlička Jan, Wild Jiri, Rusinová Kateřina, Loučka Martin, Hrdličková Lucie, Zielina Martin, Payne Cathy, Van Vliet Liesbeth M
Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 24;7:100411. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100411. eCollection 2025 Dec.
This study investigates i) acceptability, ii) predictors of intention to use, iii) barriers and facilitators, and iv) perceived advantages and disadvantages of incorporating virtual reality (VR) into serious illness communication training from the perspective of health professions educators in Europe.
An online survey was distributed using snowball sampling across health professions educators involved in the creation and/or delivery of difficult communication courses (as educators, developers, coordinators).
Seventy-five educators from 11 European countries involved in teaching serious illness communication skills completed the survey. While educators viewed VR positively and saw it as useful, their intention to implement it was moderate, possibly, due to low compatibility with current teaching methods and social norms. Major barriers reported by participants included financial constraints (62.7 %) and lack of VR training (54.7 %), while key facilitators were training availability (22 %) and technical support (11 %).
CONCLUSION/INNOVATION: Educators perceive VR as a potential supplemental tool in difficult communication education; however, overcoming financial, training, and integration barriers is essential for its broader adoption and curricular integration. Further research is necessary to validate VR's effectiveness in developing the nuanced communication skills critical for serious illness communication.
VR technology is a promising innovative tool for medical communication training.
本研究从欧洲卫生专业教育工作者的角度调查了以下方面:i)可接受性;ii)使用意愿的预测因素;iii)障碍和促进因素;iv)将虚拟现实(VR)纳入重症疾病沟通培训的感知优势和劣势。
通过滚雪球抽样法,向参与创建和/或提供困难沟通课程的卫生专业教育工作者发放在线调查问卷(作为教育工作者、开发者、协调员)。
来自11个欧洲国家的75名参与重症疾病沟通技能教学的教育工作者完成了调查。虽然教育工作者对VR持积极看法并认为其有用,但他们实施VR的意愿中等,这可能是由于与当前教学方法和社会规范的兼容性较低。参与者报告的主要障碍包括资金限制(62.7%)和缺乏VR培训(54.7%),而关键促进因素是培训可用性(22%)和技术支持(11%)。
结论/创新:教育工作者认为VR是困难沟通教育中的一种潜在补充工具;然而,克服资金、培训和整合障碍对于其更广泛的采用和课程整合至关重要。有必要进行进一步研究,以验证VR在培养重症疾病沟通关键的细微沟通技能方面的有效性。
VR技术是医学沟通培训中一种有前景的创新工具。