• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定跨组织的物理治疗特定重症护理能力框架以促进协作工作:学术健康科学中心整合历程概述

Developing a cross-organisational physiotherapy-specific critical care competency framework to enable collaborative working: an overview of the integration journey across an academic health science centre.

作者信息

Bradley Claire, Eftychiou Linda, Mylott Laura, Jerrard Kirsty, McKenzie Debbie, Morris Kelly, Pereira Charlotte, Purkiss Claire, Osman Leyla, Reilly Charles C

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

KHP Cardiovascular & Respiratory Partnership, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12912-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12912-5
PMID:40682133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12273046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Competency frameworks are commonly used to define expectations, aid acquisition of appropriate skills and ensure safe delivery of care to patients. The Intensive Care Society's Allied Health Professionals Critical Care Professional Development Framework (CCPDF) provides broad descriptors of levels of practice ranging from novice to expert. Prior to May 2021, no standardised clinical competency frameworks governed physiotherapy practice or development in the critical care setting in the UK.

METHODS

The aim was to develop and evaluate the value of a cross-organisational, physiotherapy-specific, critical care competency framework to enable collaborative working in a partnership comprising of three previously independent NHS foundation trusts across six sites within an academic health science centre. Between May and November 2021, a pragmatic approach following the first three stages of Whiddett and Hollyforde's process for developing a tailored competency framework was used: 1) preparation, 2) information collection and 3) compiling the framework and validation.

RESULTS

Following analysis of key documents and through comprehensive engagement, a proposed competency framework was agreed upon, reflecting levels from Foundation to Expert. Competencies were categorised into eight areas: Anatomy and Physiology, Assessment, Laboratory and Pharmacy, Respiratory Support, Airway Clearance Techniques, Tracheostomy, Rehabilitation, and Communication, Documentation, and Teamwork. A survey was sent to 112 staff with a 39% response rate. Most respondents said the framework would support improvement in patient care and staff development, with time and staffing being barriers to use. An online format was preferred.

CONCLUSION

The final document was called Kings Health Partners Physiotherapy Critical Care PROSPECTS (PROfession SPecific Excpectations, CompeTencies and Skills) Framework. It was valued by users as a self-assessment document and tool for career development and learning opportunities. Future work will focus on piloting the framework and developing associated learning resources.

摘要

背景

能力框架通常用于明确期望、帮助获取适当技能并确保为患者提供安全的护理服务。重症监护协会的联合健康专业人员重症监护专业发展框架(CCPDF)提供了从新手到专家的广泛实践水平描述。在2021年5月之前,英国重症监护环境中没有标准化的临床能力框架来指导物理治疗实践或发展。

方法

目的是开发并评估一个跨组织、针对物理治疗的重症监护能力框架的价值,以促进由一个学术健康科学中心内六个地点的三个先前独立的国民保健服务基金会信托组成的合作伙伴关系中的协作工作。在2021年5月至11月期间,采用了遵循Whiddett和Hollyforde制定定制能力框架过程的前三个阶段的务实方法:1)准备,2)信息收集,3)编制框架并进行验证。

结果

在对关键文件进行分析并通过全面参与后,达成了一个提议的能力框架,反映了从基础到专家的水平。能力被分为八个领域:解剖学和生理学、评估、实验室和药学、呼吸支持、气道清理技术、气管切开术、康复以及沟通、记录和团队合作。向112名工作人员发送了一份调查问卷,回复率为39%。大多数受访者表示该框架将支持改善患者护理和员工发展,时间和人员配备是使用的障碍。在线格式更受青睐。

结论

最终文件被称为国王健康伙伴物理治疗重症监护前景(PROfession SPecific Excpectations, CompeTencies and Skills)框架。它被用户视为自我评估文件以及职业发展和学习机会的工具。未来的工作将集中在对该框架进行试点并开发相关学习资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/904d/12273046/473a1911d22f/12913_2025_12912_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/904d/12273046/473a1911d22f/12913_2025_12912_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/904d/12273046/473a1911d22f/12913_2025_12912_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a cross-organisational physiotherapy-specific critical care competency framework to enable collaborative working: an overview of the integration journey across an academic health science centre.制定跨组织的物理治疗特定重症护理能力框架以促进协作工作:学术健康科学中心整合历程概述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12912-5.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
5
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
8
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
9
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
10
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting integration: the creation of a framework to support the design and delivery of clinical academic integration across a complex system.支持整合:创建一个框架,以支持在复杂系统中设计和实施临床学术整合。
Future Healthc J. 2023 Jul;10(2):161-168. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2023-0001.
2
Leading health reform: a critical review of 'leadership' within allied health competency standards.引领卫生改革:对联合健康能力标准中“领导力”的批判性评价。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):368-376. doi: 10.1071/AH20144.
3
A Digitally Competent Health Workforce: Scoping Review of Educational Frameworks.
数字化胜任力卫生人力:教育框架的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 5;22(11):e22706. doi: 10.2196/22706.
4
Developing a consolidated research framework for clinical allied health professionals practising in the UK.为在英国执业的临床相关健康专业人员制定综合研究框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):852. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05650-3.
5
The development of competency frameworks in healthcare professions: a scoping review.医疗保健专业能力框架的发展:范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):913-987. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09946-w. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Minimum standards of clinical practice for physiotherapists working in critical care settings in the United Kingdom: A modified Delphi technique.英国重症监护环境下物理治疗师的临床实践最低标准:一种改良的德尔菲技术。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 May;20(2):118-131. doi: 10.1177/1751143718807019. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
7
Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review.联合健康专业人员的研究能力建设框架——一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3518-7.
8
Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: A qualitative study.简单规则用于复杂系统中的证据转化:一项定性研究。
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1076-9.
9
Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review.将研究文化嵌入到辅助健康实践中的框架:快速综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Mar 21;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0304-2.
10
The National Competency Framework for Registered Nurses in Adult Critical Care: An overview.成人重症监护注册护士国家能力框架概述
J Intensive Care Soc. 2017 May;18(2):149-156. doi: 10.1177/1751143717691985. Epub 2017 Feb 15.