Casas Andreu, Dagher Georgia, O'Loughlin Ben
Department of Politics, International Relations and Philosophy, New Political Communication Unit, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Sep;30(3):289-291. doi: 10.1111/camh.70020. Epub 2025 Jul 20.
We respond to articles in the Child and Adolescent Mental Health journal about whether, and under what, conditions researchers should collaborate with digital companies. In particular, we discuss the challenges academics face to access and study platform data. Independent academic research in this area is crucial for identifying and combating any potential negative effects that platforms can have on individuals and societies. Past discussions on academic data access have focused on platform regulation and data governance. However, in this commentary, we argue that even if key stakeholders agree on a regulatory and governance model, platforms have strong incentives to not comply-or to comply only partially. We advocate for a more holistic strategy aiming at influencing regulation, public opinion, news media, diverse political groups and for building a robust oversight structure.
我们针对《儿童与青少年心理健康》期刊上关于研究人员是否以及在何种条件下应与数字公司合作的文章做出回应。特别是,我们讨论了学者在获取和研究平台数据时面临的挑战。这一领域的独立学术研究对于识别和应对平台可能对个人和社会产生的任何潜在负面影响至关重要。过去关于学术数据获取的讨论主要集中在平台监管和数据治理上。然而,在这篇评论中,我们认为,即使关键利益相关者就监管和治理模式达成一致,平台仍有强烈的动机不遵守——或仅部分遵守。我们主张采取一种更全面的策略,旨在影响监管、公众舆论、新闻媒体、不同政治团体,并建立一个强大的监督结构。