Scholing Judith M, Lambregts Britt I H M, van den Bosch Ruben, Aarts Esther, van der Schaaf Marieke E
Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025 Jul 5;48:101056. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101056. eCollection 2025 Oct.
Fatigue and depressive mood is inherent to acute disease, but a substantial group of people report persisting disabling fatigue and depressive symptoms long after a COVID-19 infection. Infections have been shown to change decisions about engaging in effortful and rewarding activities, but it is currently unclear whether fatigue and depressive symptoms are similarly associated with decision making during early and persistent phases after a COVID-19 infection. Here, we investigated whether fatigue and depressive mood are associated with altered weighting of reward and effort in decision making at different timepoints after COVID-19 infection.
We conducted an online cross-sectional study between March 2021 and March 2022, in which 242 participants (18-65 years) with COVID-19 < 4 weeks ago (n = 62), COVID-19 > 12 weeks ago (n = 81), or no prior COVID-19 (n = 90; self-reported) performed an effort-based decision-making task. In this task, participants accepted or rejected offers in which they could exert physical effort (ticking boxes on screen, 5 levels) to gain rewards (money to be gained in a voucher-lottery, 5 levels). State fatigue and depressive mood were measured with the Profile of Mood States (POMS) prior to the task. We used mixed binomial regression analysis to test whether fatigue and depressive mood were related to acceptance rates for reward and effort levels and whether this differed between the groups.
Compared with no COVID-19 and COVID-19 < 4 weeks groups, the COVID-19 > 12 weeks group reported higher state fatigue (mean ± SD: 20 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 7 and 12 ± 6 POMS-score, respectively; both p < 0.001) and was less sensitive to rewards (Reward∗Group: OR: 0.35 (95 %CI 0.20, 0.62), p < 0.001 and OR: 0.38 (95 %CI 0.20, 0.72), p = 0.003). In the COVID-19 > 12 weeks group, fatigue was more negatively associated with reward sensitivity compared to the COVID-19 < 4 weeks group (Reward∗Fatigue∗Group: OR 0.47 (95 %CI 0.25, 1.13), p = 0.022) and the no COVID-19 group (OR 0.48 (95 %CI 4.01, 0.92), p = 0.029). No group differences were observed for the relationship between fatigue and effort sensitivity. There were also no group differences for the relationship between depressive mood and effort or reward sensitivity. Higher age, lower BMI, unhealthy lifestyle, and worrying during the early phase of COVID-19 each predicted lower reward sensitivity in the > 12 weeks group (Age∗Reward: OR 0.30 (95 %CI 0.19, 0.48), p < 0.001; BMI∗Reward: OR 1.43 (95 %CI 1.01, 2.00), p = 0.047); Lifestyle∗Reward: OR 1.50 (95 %CI 1.06, 2.14), p = 0.022; Worrying∗Reward: OR 0.59 (95 %CI 0.38, 0.94), p = 0.025, respectively).
The finding that fatigue is related to lower reward sensitivity > 12 weeks after COVID-19 suggests potential reward deficits in post-COVID-19 fatigue. Moreover, higher age, unhealthy lifestyle, and worrying during the early phase of COVID-19 are potential risk factors for developing lower reward sensitivity. These findings are in line with previous observations that long-term inflammation induces dysregulations in neural reward processing, which should be investigated in future studies.
疲劳和抑郁情绪是急性疾病的固有症状,但相当一部分人在新冠病毒感染很久之后仍报告存在持续性的致残性疲劳和抑郁症状。已有研究表明,感染会改变人们对参与费力且有回报活动的决策,但目前尚不清楚疲劳和抑郁症状在新冠病毒感染后的早期和持续阶段是否与决策有类似关联。在此,我们研究了疲劳和抑郁情绪在新冠病毒感染后的不同时间点是否与决策中奖励和努力的权重改变有关。
我们在2021年3月至2022年3月期间进行了一项在线横断面研究,242名参与者(18 - 65岁)参与其中,他们在4周前感染新冠病毒(n = 62)、12周前感染新冠病毒(n = 81)或未曾感染过新冠病毒(n = 90;自我报告),并完成了一项基于努力的决策任务。在该任务中,参与者接受或拒绝提供的机会,即他们可以通过付出体力(在屏幕上勾选框,共5个级别)来获得奖励(在代金券抽奖中获得的金钱,共5个级别)。在任务前,使用情绪状态剖面图(POMS)测量状态疲劳和抑郁情绪。我们使用混合二项式回归分析来测试疲劳和抑郁情绪是否与奖励和努力水平的接受率相关,以及各小组之间是否存在差异。
与未感染新冠病毒组和感染新冠病毒4周内组相比,感染新冠病毒12周后组报告的状态疲劳更高(平均±标准差:分别为20±7与14±7和12±6的POMS得分;p均<0.001),且对奖励的敏感度较低(奖励组:比值比:0.35(95%置信区间0.20,0.62),p<0.001;比值比:0.38(95%置信区间0.20,0.72),p = 0.003)。在感染新冠病毒12周后组中,与感染新冠病毒4周内组(奖励疲劳组:比值比0.47(95%置信区间0.25,1.13),p = 0.022)和未感染新冠病毒组(比值比0.48(95%置信区间4.01,0.92),p = 0.029)相比,疲劳与奖励敏感度的负相关性更强。在疲劳与努力敏感度的关系上,未观察到各小组之间存在差异。在抑郁情绪与努力或奖励敏感度的关系上,也未观察到各小组之间存在差异。在感染新冠病毒12周后组中,年龄较大、体重指数较低、不健康的生活方式以及在新冠病毒感染早期感到担忧,均各自预测奖励敏感度较低(年龄奖励:比值比0.30(95%置信区间0.19,0.48),p<0.001;体重指数奖励:比值比1.43(95%置信区间1.01,2.00),p = 0.047);生活方式奖励:比值比1.50(95%置信区间1.06,2.14),p = 0.022;担忧*奖励:比值比0.59(95%置信区间0.38,0.94),p = 0.025)。
新冠病毒感染12周后疲劳与较低的奖励敏感度相关这一发现表明,新冠病毒感染后疲劳可能存在潜在的奖励缺陷。此外,年龄较大、不健康的生活方式以及在新冠病毒感染早期感到担忧,是奖励敏感度降低的潜在风险因素。这些发现与之前的观察结果一致,即长期炎症会导致神经奖励处理失调,未来研究应对此进行调查。