• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

abusive supervision对员工反生产工作行为的影响:一项有调节的中介分析

The impact of abusive supervision on employee counterproductive work behavior: a moderated mediation analysis.

作者信息

Li Jingli, Xu Guangnuo

机构信息

School of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 4;16:1455658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1455658. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1455658
PMID:40688554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12273835/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study explores how abusive supervision impacts employee counterproductive work behavior (CWB), highlighting the mediating roles of emotional exhaustion and ingratiation behavior, and the moderating role of core self-evaluation.

METHODS

Drawing on self-regulation theory and resource conservation theory, the paper tests a moderated mediation model using a three-wave survey of 198 employees.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Results indicate that abusive supervision directly increases CWB, with emotional exhaustion serving as a positive mediator and ingratiation behavior serving as a negative mediator. Core self-evaluation moderates both mediation paths. These findings provide new insights into the dual psychological mechanisms underlying workplace deviance and suggest practical strategies for mitigating abusive leadership.

摘要

引言

本研究探讨了辱虐管理如何影响员工的反生产工作行为(CWB),强调了情绪耗竭和逢迎行为的中介作用,以及核心自我评价的调节作用。

方法

基于自我调节理论和资源保存理论,本文通过对198名员工进行三轮调查,检验了一个有调节的中介模型。

结果与讨论

结果表明,辱虐管理直接增加了反生产工作行为,情绪耗竭起到了正向中介作用,逢迎行为起到了负向中介作用。核心自我评价对两条中介路径均有调节作用。这些发现为工作场所偏差行为背后的双重心理机制提供了新的见解,并提出了减轻辱虐领导行为的实用策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d5b/12273835/efd534930ab0/fpsyg-16-1455658-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d5b/12273835/efd534930ab0/fpsyg-16-1455658-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d5b/12273835/efd534930ab0/fpsyg-16-1455658-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of abusive supervision on employee counterproductive work behavior: a moderated mediation analysis.abusive supervision对员工反生产工作行为的影响:一项有调节的中介分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 4;16:1455658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1455658. eCollection 2025.
2
Paternalistic leadership and counterproductive work behavior: mediating role of leader identification and moderating effect of traditionality in Chinese generation Z employees.家长式领导与反生产工作行为:中国Z世代员工中领导认同的中介作用与传统性的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1587525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587525. eCollection 2025.
3
Behavioral dysregulation at work: A moderated mediation analysis of sleep impairment, work-related stress, and substance use.工作中的行为失调:睡眠障碍、工作相关压力和物质使用的调节中介分析
AIMS Public Health. 2025 Mar 12;12(2):290-309. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025018. eCollection 2025.
4
Employee helping behavior and abusive supervision: the moderating role of supervisor-attributed motives.员工帮助行为与辱骂式监督:主管归因动机的调节作用
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02914-7.
5
Examination of daily abusive supervision effects on next-day employee wellbeing: a spillover perspective.日常辱骂性监督对次日员工幸福感的影响研究:溢出视角
Aust J Psychol. 2023 Oct 29;75(1):2264938. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2023.2264938. eCollection 2023.
6
Interpersonal psychological needs as mediators linking abusive supervision and concurrent suicidal ideation: mediation analysis using parallel-process latent growth models based on a diary study.作为连接虐待性监督与并发自杀意念中介因素的人际心理需求:基于日记研究的平行过程潜在增长模型的中介分析
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 15;13(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02966-9.
7
From exclusion to deviance: understanding the impact of workplace ostracism on nurses' deviant behaviors through emotional exhaustion and defensive silence.从被排斥到越轨:通过情感耗竭和防御性沉默理解职场排斥对护士越轨行为的影响
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03427-9.
8
Leading with purpose: unraveling the impact of motivating language on work engagement with a focus on psychological meaningfulness in the tourism and hospitality sector.以目标为导向:揭示激励性语言对工作投入的影响,重点关注旅游和酒店业中的心理意义。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02977-6.
9
The impact of work gamification on Chinese employee creativity: a moderated mediation model.工作游戏化对中国员工创造力的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1494789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494789. eCollection 2025.
10
E-leadership drives employee creativity through emotional exhaustion with regulatory focus as a moderator.电子领导力通过情感耗竭驱动员工创造力,其中调节焦点起调节作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05131-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Understanding beyond the Familiar: Disparity in Visual Abilities Does Not Impede Empathy and Theory of Mind.超越熟悉范畴的社会理解:视觉能力的差异并不妨碍同理心和心理理论。
J Intell. 2023 Dec 25;12(1):2. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010002.
2
The brief introduction to organizational citizenship behaviors and counterproductive work behaviors: a literature review.组织公民行为与反生产工作行为简介:文献综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 13;14:1181930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181930. eCollection 2023.
3
Regional differences of COVID-19 pandemic prevention in China: Especially from the perspective of political leaders.
中国新冠疫情防控的地区差异:特别是从政治领导人的角度来看。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;10:1037242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1037242. eCollection 2022.
4
Person-Job Misfit: Perceived Overqualification and Counterproductive Work Behavior.人岗不匹配:感知到的学历过高与反生产工作行为
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:936900. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936900. eCollection 2022.
5
Is supervisory communication more important than co-worker communication for employees' engagement behavior in China? A moderated mediation analysis.监管沟通对中国员工敬业行为比同事沟通更重要吗?一个被调节的中介分析。
Work. 2023;75(1):253-263. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211425.
6
Sticking out versus fitting in: A social context perspective of ingratiation and its effect on social exchange quality with supervisors and teammates.脱颖而出与融入群体:逢迎行为的社会情境视角及其对与上级和队友的社会交换质量的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Jan;107(1):95-108. doi: 10.1037/apl0000852. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
The role of core self-evaluations in the coping process.核心自我评价在应对过程中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):177-95. doi: 10.1037/a0013214.
8
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
9
Self-serving interpretations of flattery: why ingratiation works.奉承的利己主义解读:为何逢迎奏效。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Apr;82(4):515-26.
10
Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover.情感耗竭作为工作绩效和自愿离职的预测指标。
J Appl Psychol. 1998 Jun;83(3):486-93. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.486.