Ke Yangjie, Liu Li, Gu Manli
School of Business, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1587525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587525. eCollection 2025.
This study investigates how paternalistic leadership (authoritarian, benevolent, and moral) affects counterproductive work behavior among Chinese Generation Z employees. By integrating culturally specific leadership styles with generational traits, this research offers insights into the mechanisms driving counterproductive work behavior in the Chinese workplace. Drawing upon social identity theory and the cultural context of traditional China, we propose a moderated mediation model where leader identification acts as a mediator and the employee's traditionality serves as a moderator.
We collected data through a multi-wave survey of 324 Gen Z employees in China. The collected data were analyzed in Stata 17.0 using multiple regression analysis, examining the relationship between paternalistic leadership and counterproductive work behavior.
Results reveal that benevolent and moral leadership reduce counterproductive work behavior, while authoritarian leadership increases it. Leader identification fully mediates the effects of benevolent and moral leadership, and partially mediates the effect of authoritarian leadership. Traditionality negatively moderates the relationship between paternalistic leadership and leader identification, with lower traditionality strengthening this connection.
These results highlight the complex dynamics between leadership styles and employee behavior, providing insights for creating productive and harmonious workplaces for Gen Z employees in China. The findings also emphasize leader identification as a key mechanism and traditionality as a contextual moderator shaping these effects, underscoring the need for adaptive leadership approaches.
本研究探讨家长式领导风格(专制型、仁慈型和道德型)如何影响中国Z世代员工的反生产工作行为。通过将特定文化背景下的领导风格与代际特征相结合,本研究深入剖析了中国职场中反生产工作行为背后的驱动机制。基于社会认同理论和中国传统文化背景,我们提出了一个有调节的中介模型,其中领导认同作为中介变量,员工的传统性作为调节变量。
我们通过对324名中国Z世代员工进行多轮调查收集数据。使用Stata 17.0对收集到的数据进行多元回归分析,以检验家长式领导与反生产工作行为之间的关系。
结果显示,仁慈型和道德型领导会减少反生产工作行为,而专制型领导会增加这种行为。领导认同完全中介了仁慈型和道德型领导的影响,部分中介了专制型领导的影响。传统性对家长式领导与领导认同之间的关系起到负向调节作用,传统性越低,这种联系越强。
这些结果凸显了领导风格与员工行为之间复杂的动态关系,为在中国为Z世代员工创造高效和谐的工作场所提供了见解。研究结果还强调领导认同是一个关键机制,传统性是塑造这些影响的情境调节因素,强调了采用适应性领导方法的必要性。