• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HKA轴随膝关节运动变化显著:全膝关节置换术中的机器人辅助术中评估支持使用动态而非静态对线分类。

The HKA axis varies significantly with knee motion: A robot-assisted intraoperative evaluation during total knee arthroplasty supports the use of dynamic, not static, alignment classifications.

作者信息

Qordja Fjorela, Valpiana Pieralberto, Andriollo Luca, Rossi Stefano Marco Paolo, Salvi Andrea Giordano, Bocchino Guido, Zepeda Karlos, Benazzo Francesco, Indelli Pier Francesco

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Clinic of Orthopaedics Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona Italy.

Südtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb Brixen Italy.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;12(3):e70370. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70370. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70370
PMID:40689101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12272511/
Abstract

PURPOSE

New alignment classifications based on phenotype reproduction have recently been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as alternatives to traditional mechanical alignment. These classifications were designed according to the static hip-knee-ankle angle (sHKA) measurement from long leg radiographs (LLRs). This study aimed to understand whether and how the HKA varied throughout the knee's range of motion (ROM) during robot-assisted TKA.

METHODS

This prospective, bi-centric cohort study involved 107 consecutive patients undergoing primary robot-assisted TKA. The surgical technique adhered to restricted kinematic alignment (HKA ± 3°) with asymmetric gap balancing principles. The HKA's dynamic variation (dHKA) was assessed intraoperatively at full extension, as well as at 30°, 45°, 60°, 90° and 120°, both before bone cuts and after the positioning of the trial components. The overall cohort was initially analyzed, followed by a subgroup analysis based on varus, neutral and valgus phenotypes. A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate dHKA trends. Collected data were then analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction and Bland-Altman plots to assess significant variations in dHKA across the ROM during flexion and to quantify outliers from the established safe boundaries of ±3°.

RESULTS

Out of 107 knees, the pre-cut dHKA demonstrated a biphasic trend, decreasing in varus until 60° and then transitioning toward valgus, with significant differences primarily noted at 90° and 120°. Post-cut, the dHKA exhibited an overall varus trend, increasing from full extension to 60° before experiencing a partial recovery. Significant differences were detected primarily at the initial flexion angles. Outlier rates increased with flexion: pre-cut from 6.5% to 43.0%, and post-cut from 1.9% to 30.8%, highlighting progressive inter-individual variability throughout. Although the analysis was stratified by knee phenotype, the post-cut dHKA trend did not differ among the various phenotypes or in comparison to the overall cohort trend.

CONCLUSIONS

The main finding of the current study was that intraoperative dHKA differs significantly from sHKA during robot-assisted TKA. Moreover, the sHKA was limited in predicting the actual kinematic HKA. Planning the final TKA alignment on static, standing LLRs may have limited value compared to intraoperative planning conducted with enabling technologies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

摘要

目的

基于表型再现的新对线分类法最近在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中被引入,作为传统机械对线的替代方法。这些分类法是根据长腿X线片(LLR)测量的静态髋-膝-踝角(sHKA)设计的。本研究旨在了解在机器人辅助TKA过程中,HKA在膝关节活动范围(ROM)内是否以及如何变化。

方法

这项前瞻性、双中心队列研究纳入了107例连续接受初次机器人辅助TKA的患者。手术技术遵循受限运动学对线(HKA±3°)和不对称间隙平衡原则。在全伸直位以及在截骨前和试模组件定位后,分别在30°、45°、60°、90°和120°时术中评估HKA动态变化(dHKA)。首先对整个队列进行分析,然后根据内翻、中立和外翻表型进行亚组分析。进行描述性分析以评估dHKA趋势。然后使用单因素重复测量方差分析并进行Bonferroni校正以及Bland-Altman图分析收集的数据,以评估屈曲过程中ROM内dHKA的显著变化,并量化超出既定±3°安全边界的异常值。

结果

在107个膝关节中,截骨前dHKA呈现双相趋势,在内翻时直至60°减小,然后转变为外翻,主要在90°和120°时存在显著差异。截骨后,dHKA总体呈现内翻趋势,从全伸直位增加至60°,然后部分恢复。主要在初始屈曲角度检测到显著差异。异常值发生率随屈曲增加:截骨前从6.5%增至43.0%,截骨后从1.9%增至30.8%,突出显示了整个过程中个体间变异性的增加。尽管分析按膝关节表型分层,但截骨后dHKA趋势在不同表型之间或与整个队列趋势相比并无差异。

结论

本研究的主要发现是,在机器人辅助TKA过程中,术中dHKA与sHKA存在显著差异。此外-sHKA在预测实际运动学HKA方面存在局限性。与使用现有技术进行的术中规划相比,基于静态站立LLR规划最终TKA对线可能价值有限。

证据水平

3级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/76ce4c078496/JEO2-12-e70370-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/29e2f9ac37ea/JEO2-12-e70370-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/8ccaf16c5805/JEO2-12-e70370-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/9ba9b558a2eb/JEO2-12-e70370-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/76ce4c078496/JEO2-12-e70370-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/29e2f9ac37ea/JEO2-12-e70370-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/8ccaf16c5805/JEO2-12-e70370-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/9ba9b558a2eb/JEO2-12-e70370-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b8b/12272511/76ce4c078496/JEO2-12-e70370-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The HKA axis varies significantly with knee motion: A robot-assisted intraoperative evaluation during total knee arthroplasty supports the use of dynamic, not static, alignment classifications.HKA轴随膝关节运动变化显著:全膝关节置换术中的机器人辅助术中评估支持使用动态而非静态对线分类。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;12(3):e70370. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70370. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90° of flexion impacts clinical outcomes.机器人全膝关节置换时代的一个新参数:屈膝90°时的冠状面力线影响临床结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2581-2591. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12648. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Conventional mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty effectively achieves personalised alignment: A single surgeon series of 2472 knees.传统活动平台单髁膝关节置换术可有效实现个性化对线:一位外科医生的2472例膝关节系列病例
J Orthop. 2025 Jul 5;66:303-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.029. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Kinematic Alignment Does Not Result in Clinically Important Improvements After TKA Compared With Mechanical Alignment: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.与机械对线相比,全膝关节置换术后运动学对线并未带来具有临床意义的改善:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1020-1030. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003356. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
EPMEDBOT robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty amplifies the advantage of intraoperative dynamic gap balance and alignment monitoring - a prospective randomized controlled and single center study.EPMEDBOT机器人辅助全膝关节置换术放大了术中动态间隙平衡和对线监测的优势——一项前瞻性随机对照单中心研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 18;20(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06100-8.
6
Learning curve of robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty within a surgical team: A prospective study of 115 cases.手术团队中机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的学习曲线:115例前瞻性研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Jun 30:104325. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104325.
7
What is the "safe zone" for transition of coronal alignment from systematic to a more personalised one in total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.全膝关节置换术中从系统对线到更个性化对线的冠状位“安全区”是多少?系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06811-5. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
8
Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis.导航、机器人、患者特异性器械与标准截骨导板在 TKA 中准确性或结果评分是否存在差异?一项网络荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2105-2116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001324.
9
The relationship between fibular head height and lower limb alignment deviation and severity after TKA for varus deformity knee osteoarthritis.膝内翻畸形膝骨关节炎全膝关节置换术后腓骨头高度与下肢力线偏差及严重程度的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0327168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327168. eCollection 2025.
10
Evaluation of soft tissue balancing and component alignment in computer-navigated TKA for valgus knee.计算机导航下外翻膝全膝关节置换术中软组织平衡和组件对线的评估
J Orthop. 2025 Mar 25;62:160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.054. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Implant placement parameters are associated with post operative dynamic varus and valgus knee angle in robotic assisted TKA.在机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中,植入物放置参数与术后膝关节动态内翻和外翻角度相关。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98057-1.
2
Projected Lifetime Cancer Risks From Current Computed Tomography Imaging.当前计算机断层扫描成像的预计终生癌症风险
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0505.
3
A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90° of flexion impacts clinical outcomes.
机器人全膝关节置换时代的一个新参数:屈膝90°时的冠状面力线影响临床结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2581-2591. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12648. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
4
Comparison of the accuracy and efficacy of different assistive techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis.不同辅助技术在初次全膝关节置换术中的准确性和疗效比较:一项网状Meta分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Nov 28;11(4):e70098. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70098. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Kinematic versus mechanical alignment: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.运动学对线与机械学对线:对随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析的系统综述
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 30;11(4):e70044. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70044. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
The epidemic of alignment classifications in total knee arthroplasty forgives the kinematic of the human knee.全膝关节置换术中对线分类的流行忽视了人类膝关节的运动学。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 24;11(4):e70052. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70052. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Same same but different-Image-based versus imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty!大同小异——基于图像与无图像的机器人辅助全膝关节置换术!
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 19;11(4):e70062. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70062. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
No difference in postoperative patient satisfaction rates between mechanical and kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.机械对线与运动学对线全膝关节置换术后患者满意度无差异:一项系统评价。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Jul 24;11(3):e12101. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12101. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Why we should use boundaries for personalised knee arthroplasty and the lack of evidence for unrestricted kinematic alignment.为何我们应在个性化膝关节置换中使用边界以及缺乏无限制运动学对线的证据。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Aug;32(8):1917-1922. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12266. Epub 2024 May 28.
10
Alignment is only part of the equation: High variability in soft tissue distractibility in the varus knee undergoing primary TKA.对线只是其中一部分因素:初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中内翻膝关节软组织可牵张性存在高度变异性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Jun;32(6):1516-1524. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12115. Epub 2024 Mar 15.